2019
DOI: 10.1177/0047239519877614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Group Size and Structure of Online Discussion Forums Influence Student Engagement and Learning

Abstract: There are many challenges to simulate the experience of a professional facing a complex situation in a discussion of a case study using an online discussion forum. The current research examines the role of two aspects of discussion forum format (group size and discussion structure) on two outcome variables (student engagement and learning). We hypothesized that more structured discussions would better enable student learning but be worse in facilitating student engagement compared with less structured discussi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of engagement, community, and tool usability, the largest group, G80, responded more favorably, though not substantially so, in the majority of categories including feeling more connected to While many of our results mirror others (Amry, 2018;Baisley-Nodine et al, 2018;Delahunty, 2018;Jones-Roberts, 2018;Lou et al, 2023;Massey et al, 2018;Osborne et al, 2018;West et al, 2015), a few were in notable contrast (Akcaoglua & Lee, 2016;Chen et al, 2018;Peddibhotla & Jani, 2019;Qui & McDougal, 2015). The discussion section is organized by the three primary points of interest: community, engagement in learning, and technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 39%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of engagement, community, and tool usability, the largest group, G80, responded more favorably, though not substantially so, in the majority of categories including feeling more connected to While many of our results mirror others (Amry, 2018;Baisley-Nodine et al, 2018;Delahunty, 2018;Jones-Roberts, 2018;Lou et al, 2023;Massey et al, 2018;Osborne et al, 2018;West et al, 2015), a few were in notable contrast (Akcaoglua & Lee, 2016;Chen et al, 2018;Peddibhotla & Jani, 2019;Qui & McDougal, 2015). The discussion section is organized by the three primary points of interest: community, engagement in learning, and technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 39%
“…Intentional instructor interaction may be a key for community building (Chen et al, 2018). Furthermore, Peddibhotla and Jani (2019) demonstrated that larger and therefore, more unstructured groups were supportive of learning outcomes, but not necessarily student engagement or building community.…”
Section: Communitymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…-Written feedback from a PMASE student, October 9 th 2021 Teams include the cohort writ-large and student project teams. The faculty steers discussions of value to the entire cohort to a common "blog-style" forum, consistent with on-line learning styles (Peddibhotla & Jani 2019).…”
Section: Key Balances To Maintainmentioning
confidence: 83%