2005
DOI: 10.1080/10854681.2005.11426421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Green is Judicial Review?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Aarhus Convention requires that all members of the public ''having a sufficient interest'' should have the opportunity to challenge the substantive and procedural legality of any decision before an independent and impartial body established by law, through a procedure that is ''not prohibitively expensive''. 80 In the light of continuing concerns over the accessibility of judicial review in terms of both standing and costs, 81 and the absence of opportunities to make use of other means of effective recourse, 82 there remain considerable doubts over whether this requirement is in fact satisfied.…”
Section: Protection Of Other Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Aarhus Convention requires that all members of the public ''having a sufficient interest'' should have the opportunity to challenge the substantive and procedural legality of any decision before an independent and impartial body established by law, through a procedure that is ''not prohibitively expensive''. 80 In the light of continuing concerns over the accessibility of judicial review in terms of both standing and costs, 81 and the absence of opportunities to make use of other means of effective recourse, 82 there remain considerable doubts over whether this requirement is in fact satisfied.…”
Section: Protection Of Other Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%