How Good People Make Bad Collectives

Mutz, Diana C.; Flemming, Gregory N.

doi:10.4324/9780429501418-5

Cited by 13 publications

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Compromise in an Age of Party Polarization

Wolak¹

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Congressional debates are increasingly defined by gridlock and stalemate, with partisan showdowns that lead to government shutdowns. Compromise in Congress seems hard to reach. But do politicians deserve all the blame? Legislators who resist concessions and stand firm to their convictions might be doing just what voters want them to do. If this is true, however, then citizens must shoulder some of the responsibility for gridlock in Congress. This book challenges this wisdom and argues that Americans value compromise as a way to resolve differences in times of partisan division. Using evidence from a variety of surveys and innovative experiments, the book demonstrates that citizens want more from politics than just ideological representation—they also care about the processes by which disagreements are settled. Americans believe that compromise is a virtuous way to resolve political disputes. Because people’s desire for compromise is deeply rooted in socialized support for democratic values, principled beliefs about compromise can serve as a check on partisan thinking. Across a range of settings, people’s support for compromise persists even when it comes at the cost of partisan goals and policy objectives. People give warmer evaluations to members of Congress who are willing to compromise and view compromise legislation as more legitimate. People care about not just outcomes, but also the way decisions are reached. Winning isn’t everything in politics. People also value the democratic principle of compromise.

show abstract

Compromise in an Age of Party Polarization

Wolak¹

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Copyright Page

Wolak

2020

Compromise in an Age of Party Polarization

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Challenges of Compromise

Wolak¹

2020

Compromise in an Age of Party Polarization

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a time of party polarization, compromises seem increasingly uncommon in Congress. To what degree can this be attributed to the demands of the electorate? If people value partisan fidelity and ideological congruence from their representatives above all else, then legislators who resist compromises are merely acting in the interests of their constituents. In this chapter, the challenges of finding compromise in Congress are discussed, as well as the reasons to expect citizens to dislike policy compromises. The puzzle for the book is introduced: Why and when are people willing to consider compromise as a solution to political disagreements? The answer to this question is previewed: people learn in school about the virtues of compromise in politics, and this socialized support for democratic values checks people’s partisan tendencies when it comes to considering political compromise.

show abstract

How Good People Make Bad Collectives

Cited by 13 publications

References 0 publications

Compromise in an Age of Party Polarization

Compromise in an Age of Party Polarization

Copyright Page

The Challenges of Compromise

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About