2020
DOI: 10.3390/socsci9070118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Good Are Child Vulnerability Assessment Tools in China?

Abstract: Accurately assessing children’s vulnerabilities and needs is important for child service delivery in social work. In China, different agencies (including international non-governmental organizations, government sectors and social organizations) utilize different tools for assessing children’s needs. However, the advantages and disadvantages of these tools have been rarely discussed, leaving their quality and effectiveness unknown. As a result, it is difficult to realize the goal of improving the well-b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is happening where the mother's role as primary socialization agent for children needs to be strengthened and re-empowered, although this requires systematic efforts supported by the government, NGOs, educational institutions, religious institutions, and the community, especially for mothers who have limitations in paying attention to children in the digital world. In addition, the social movement also needs accurately assessing for child vulnerability and needs (Handrianto, 2017;Qi & Wu, 2020).…”
Section: Garutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is happening where the mother's role as primary socialization agent for children needs to be strengthened and re-empowered, although this requires systematic efforts supported by the government, NGOs, educational institutions, religious institutions, and the community, especially for mothers who have limitations in paying attention to children in the digital world. In addition, the social movement also needs accurately assessing for child vulnerability and needs (Handrianto, 2017;Qi & Wu, 2020).…”
Section: Garutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three research team members were involved in the assessment (WM, US, DC) and resolved all disagreements. The appraised studies included systematic reviews [60][61][62][63][64][65], qualitative [66], mixed methods [67][68][69], and quantitative studies [70,71], as outlined in Tables 2-4. Only two qualitative design studies were excluded, as they could not specify if the interviewed participants were children or adults.…”
Section: Critical Appraisal For Selected Studies /Risk Of Bias Of The...mentioning
confidence: 99%