Globalizing India 2016
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781316480540.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How global rules and markets are shaping India's rise to power

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…External opening has been calibrated to meet this goal: trade barriers have come down but only slowly; and the role of foreign investment in the growth process in India-while increasing-is still relatively limited. Even after India lost its battles with the WTO, more recent trade liberalization has been accompanied by state intervention aimed at helping Indian business groups cope with a more open economy (Sinha 2016).…”
Section: The Probusiness Tiltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…External opening has been calibrated to meet this goal: trade barriers have come down but only slowly; and the role of foreign investment in the growth process in India-while increasing-is still relatively limited. Even after India lost its battles with the WTO, more recent trade liberalization has been accompanied by state intervention aimed at helping Indian business groups cope with a more open economy (Sinha 2016).…”
Section: The Probusiness Tiltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faced with a new status quo , some actors that opposed TRIPS adjusted to the new environment and began to see opportunities where they previously felt only threats. When this happened, they revised their political strategies and were likely to seek alliances with actors that had supported the introduction of new arrangements (Sinha, 2016 ; Shadlen, 2011 ).…”
Section: The International Political Economy Of Harmonization: From Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the Indian firms generally perceived the TRIPS agreement as a threat to their continued success. This fragmentation led to the rise of two industry associations (Sinha, 2016). The Indian Drug Manufacturers Association (IDMA) had been formed in 1961 to represent the interests of domestic firms (including Ranbaxy and Cipla) to the Indian government.…”
Section: Evolution Of the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry And Key Instmentioning
confidence: 99%