2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2012.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Galactic Cosmic Ray models affect the estimation of radiation exposure in space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, when the models are evaluated over a common epoch and propagated through a transport code, it has been found that differences on integrated quantities like dose, dose equivalent, or effective dose can exceed 50% [ Mrigakshi et al ., ]. This is also shown below in Figure , where relative differences between the BON2010 and BON2011 models reach 50% near 1991 and 2001 and exceed 30% for several epochs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, when the models are evaluated over a common epoch and propagated through a transport code, it has been found that differences on integrated quantities like dose, dose equivalent, or effective dose can exceed 50% [ Mrigakshi et al ., ]. This is also shown below in Figure , where relative differences between the BON2010 and BON2011 models reach 50% near 1991 and 2001 and exceed 30% for several epochs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The proton effective dose behind shielding has the broadest distribution of any ion, ranging from 100 MeV/n to 10 GeV/n—consistent with similar results from Mrigakshi et al . []. The heavy ion distributions narrow because secondary ions produced in nuclear interactions are typically less biologically damaging than the original ion.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various other assets have measured light ions and higher energy heavy ions but for only short time periods. The limited measurements were shown to lead to a calibration bias, in which the models are found to be reasonably accurate (less than 15% model error) [ NCRP , ] when compared to the available data, but larger differences (>50%) in radiation exposure calculations behind shielding using the GCR models were found [ Mrigakshi et al , ; Slaba and Blattnig , ]. The discovery of the calibration bias has led to more rigorous sensitivity analysis and validation [ Slaba and Blattnig , ; Slaba et al , ].…”
Section: Galactic Cosmic Ray Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mrigakshi et al (2012Mrigakshi et al ( , 2013aMrigakshi et al ( , 2013b and have investigated several models suitable as input for the calculation of radiation exposure in space and found that the most suitable models currently available are BO-10 model (O'Neill 2010) and the DLR model (Matthiä et al 2013). GCR consists mainly of fully ionized atomic nuclei of which about 87% are hydrogen, 12% helium, and about 1% heavier nuclei (Simpson 1983).…”
Section: Galactic Cosmic Ray Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These transport models, which are discussed in more detail below, have to be combined with models of the primary GCR spectra taking into account the solar modulation. Following recent studies evaluating different GCR models concerning their applicability for the calculation of radiation exposure (Mrigakshi et al 2012(Mrigakshi et al , 2013b the Badhwar-O'Neill 2010model (O'Neill 2010, named BO-10 hereafter, and the model by Matthiä et al (2013), named DLR model hereafter (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft-und Raumfahrt, DLR), are used in this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%