2002
DOI: 10.1177/03635465020300041001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Four Weeks of Implantation Affect the Strength and Stiffness of a Tendon Graft in a Bone Tunnel

Abstract: The pace of rehabilitation may need to be adjusted based on the type of fixation device used to secure a soft tissue graft.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
2
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(45 reference statements)
2
78
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sheep and goat have commonly been chosen as animal models for the knee [30][31][32][33] because of anatomical [34][35][36][37] and mechanical [38][39][40][41] similarities to human ACLs. These sheep were obtained from the Michigan Livestock Exchange, various farms in the area or intra-university transfer.…”
Section: Animal Model and Animal Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sheep and goat have commonly been chosen as animal models for the knee [30][31][32][33] because of anatomical [34][35][36][37] and mechanical [38][39][40][41] similarities to human ACLs. These sheep were obtained from the Michigan Livestock Exchange, various farms in the area or intra-university transfer.…”
Section: Animal Model and Animal Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the graft has been biologically incorporated into the bone tunnels, the stiffness of fixation may either increase or decrease depending on the fixation device [36].…”
Section: Importance and Interpretutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors that influence the healing of a tendon within a bone tunnel are many and include the amount of the tendon within the tunnel at the time of surgery, the initial fit of the tendon within the tunnel, the length of time from implantation and the fixation methods used. To our knowledge, only one study [9] has compared the biomechanics of two fixation devices at the time of implantation and three weeks later; this study served as a model for the present study. In that study, Singhatat et al [9] demonstrated that the biomechanical properties of a complex measured after implantation are not the same as those measured at implantation and may either deteriorate or improve, depending on the type of fixation, either distant from the joint entrance (suspended fixation) or near the tunnel entrance (aperture or anatomical fixation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, only one study [9] has compared the biomechanics of two fixation devices at the time of implantation and three weeks later; this study served as a model for the present study. In that study, Singhatat et al [9] demonstrated that the biomechanical properties of a complex measured after implantation are not the same as those measured at implantation and may either deteriorate or improve, depending on the type of fixation, either distant from the joint entrance (suspended fixation) or near the tunnel entrance (aperture or anatomical fixation). Among the devices tested by the authors, the WasherLoc (Arthrotek, Warsaw, Indiana, USA), which provided a suspended fixation, maintained its strength and improved its stiffness three weeks after implantation, while the BioInterference Screw (Arthrex, Naples, Florida, USA) significantly lost its strength and stiffness after implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation