2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2010.5652603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How far is SLAM from a linear least squares problem?

Abstract: Most people believe SLAM is a complex nonlinear estimation/optimization problem. However, recent research shows that some simple iterative methods based on linearization can sometimes provide surprisingly good solutions to SLAM without being trapped into a local minimum. This demonstrates that hidden structure exists in the SLAM problem that is yet to be understood. In this paper, we first analyze how far SLAM is from a convex optimization problem. Then we show that by properly choosing the state vector, SLAM … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Robustness In presence of noise from several sources in the SLAM pipeline, it is sometimes hard for the estimation algorithm to generate optimum estimates of the map and trajectory. Very limited research work has been done to guarantee the optimality of a SLAM estimate or at least verify whether or not the estimate is optimal [17][18][19][55][56][57]. To that end, post-processing SLAM estimates by means of a neural network, for example, might result in significant improvements to the estimated trajectory and reconstructed map, and hence a more robust SLAM system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robustness In presence of noise from several sources in the SLAM pipeline, it is sometimes hard for the estimation algorithm to generate optimum estimates of the map and trajectory. Very limited research work has been done to guarantee the optimality of a SLAM estimate or at least verify whether or not the estimate is optimal [17][18][19][55][56][57]. To that end, post-processing SLAM estimates by means of a neural network, for example, might result in significant improvements to the estimated trajectory and reconstructed map, and hence a more robust SLAM system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For optimization-based SLAM, a poor initial guess of variables will lead to poor convergence performance. Rotation may be the cause of nonlinearity and has a strong impact on the divergence of estimation [205,206], thus the accumulated vehicle orientation error will cause the inconsistency of the SLAM problem. One solution to the linearization challenge is the Linear SLAM algorithm proposed in [205], which modifies the relative state vector and carries out "map joining".…”
Section: Issue Of Estimation Driftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rotation may be the cause of nonlinearity and has a strong impact on the divergence of estimation [205,206], thus the accumulated vehicle orientation error will cause the inconsistency of the SLAM problem. One solution to the linearization challenge is the Linear SLAM algorithm proposed in [205], which modifies the relative state vector and carries out "map joining". Sub-map joining, which involves solving a linear least squares problem and performing nonlinear coordinate transformations, does not require an initial guess or iteration.…”
Section: Issue Of Estimation Driftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reviewed above, a key factor stymieing the performance enhancement in practice may refer to non-convexity in smoothing and locality in filtering; see for example [34] for an attempt of understanding the nonlinearity structure in one-step SLAM. With such a consideration, a natural question openly arises in [13] where it is stated: "How far is SLAM from a linear least squares problem?" The main purpose of this paper is to give an affirmative answer to the above question in the context of visual inertial SLAM without involving any linearization or approximation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%