2018
DOI: 10.1177/1745499918795587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Faculty Members Develop Views on Internationalization: The Case of a Top-Ranked Indian Business School

Abstract: Internationalization of higher education is considered to be among the most widely researched as well as one of the most misunderstood topics. In this study, we take a phenomenological approach to better understand what internationalization means to faculty members at a leading business school in India, as the country has emerged as one of the largest providers of management education in the world today. This is important because faculty members are considered to be the key drivers of internationalization at t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Australian faculty anticipated work success and a research-driven academic reputation (Proctor, 2016), but the American faculty sought professional or personal recognition, global travel opportunities, and developing global networks, students, and institutions (Klyberg, 2012; Nyangau, 2018a; Sanderlin, 2012). In India, a non-Anglophone country, faculty were keen on enriching the local learning and research capacity for global competitiveness (Amblee & Dhayanithy, 2018), a view like the Chinese faculty. C20 stated: “We seek internationalization activities to expand our thinking, help us to solve complex problems, and above all, identify trending research.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Australian faculty anticipated work success and a research-driven academic reputation (Proctor, 2016), but the American faculty sought professional or personal recognition, global travel opportunities, and developing global networks, students, and institutions (Klyberg, 2012; Nyangau, 2018a; Sanderlin, 2012). In India, a non-Anglophone country, faculty were keen on enriching the local learning and research capacity for global competitiveness (Amblee & Dhayanithy, 2018), a view like the Chinese faculty. C20 stated: “We seek internationalization activities to expand our thinking, help us to solve complex problems, and above all, identify trending research.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%