2017 Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/intellisys.2017.8324363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How efficient is Twitter: Predicting 2012 U.S. presidential elections using Support Vector Machine via Twitter and comparing against Iowa Electronic Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soler [4] developed a tool to define experiments and to capture the defined conversations and have applied it to the cases of three Spanish elections during 2011 and 2012. Soler concludes that Twitter may be a valid tool for predicting election result, confirm several aforementioned researches such as [9,12].…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Soler [4] developed a tool to define experiments and to capture the defined conversations and have applied it to the cases of three Spanish elections during 2011 and 2012. Soler concludes that Twitter may be a valid tool for predicting election result, confirm several aforementioned researches such as [9,12].…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 71%
“…A total of 40 million unique tweets were collected and analyzed between September 29th, 2012 and November 6th, 2012. The SVM prediction results are positively correlated with the IEM and predict Obama winning the election, implying that Twitter can be considered as a valid source in predicting US Presidential election outcomes [9]. Huyen et al used the United States election in 2016 as the source data from Twitter.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the virtual campaign using Twitter, we found that the conversations that were circulating were very much dominated by SARA narratives, where each camp used it to attack each other [22]. The battle of SARA, based propaganda testimonials is visible in both accounts [23]. The @Pababowo account in the campaign also once said thanks to the scholars who support it, which is a type of testimonial propaganda [24].…”
Section: Intertextualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers (Attarwala et al, 2017;Dionísio et al, 2019;Le Sceller et al, 2017) introduced Twitter-based approaches to design a pipeline for threat detection and, more generally, semantic analysis. Dionísio et al (2019) start from a set of customers, whose experts chose the Twitter cybersecurity accounts to monitor.…”
Section: Real-time Threat Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%