How effective are population health surveys for estimating prevalence of chronic conditions compared to anonymised clinical data?

Abstract

Population health surveys are used to record person-reported outcome measures for chronic health conditions and provide a useful source of data when evaluating potential disease burdens. The reliability of survey-based prevalence estimates for chronic diseases is unclear nonetheless. This study applied methodological triangulation to validate prevalence of selected chronic conditions (angina, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and asthma) using data for a combined cohort of 11,323 adults from the 2013 and 2014 sweeps of the Welsh Health Survey (WHS). This approach utilised consented survey data linked to primary and secondary care electronic health record (EHR) data within the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank.
 Validation of self-reported chronic conditions using data linkage and clinical codes is demonstrated with varied success. Point prevalence based on survey data was shown to be slightly under-reported for all four conditions when compared with clinical data. Case identification for separate cardiovascular conditions was problematic without use of specific medication codes for each condition, but was more straightforward for asthma, where there was an extensive list of medications available. Whilst the results provide external validity for the WHS as an instrument for assessing disease burdens for chronic conditions, they also indicate that comparable prevalence estimates can be produced using clinical data if a condition-specific set of clinical codes are available.

A Community-Based Survey to Assess the Prevalence and Etiological Factors for Type Ii Diabetes Mellitus in the Two Regional States of Southern India–a Pilot Study

“…This might be considered one of the robust causative factors behind the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in such people. Therefore, the current survey was conducted in daily wage workers and also others concerned about the prevalence of diabetes, which might be helpful in the assessment and analysing of the same [24]. There were a few limitations in the present study.…”

Childbearing with Hypermobile Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome and Hypermobility Spectrum Disorders: A Large International Survey of Outcomes and Complications

“…These data cover a large number of pregnancies (N = 1338) in over six countries and three continents, inclusive of up-to-date diagnostic criteria for hEDS/HSD. Population health surveys are useful for estimating condition prevalence [88], and this research specifically provides novel insights into perinatal complications and outcomes that may need additional considerations by contextualising them with reported incidences in the general population. Comparison statistics were chosen with preference given to recently published large empirical studies, reviews or guidelines from a similar context (e.g., high income country) and international variation in outcomes such as gestational age have been reported [89].…”