2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How effective are digital technology-based interventions at promoting colorectal cancer screening uptake in average-risk populations? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research should focus on identifying effective intervention strategies within European settings and other countries worldwide to assess whether there are specific differences in screening barriers and uptake between countries, including a more diverse range of health inequity groups, for example, LGBTQ+ persons. A recent meta-analysis of digital interventions aiming to promote colorectal cancer screening uptake in people of average risk also noted that current evidence is based only on studies from Western settings and that more work was needed to verify if the same outcomes can be achieved in other populations, especially within Asia (Lau et al ., 2022). More research is needed to identify how such interventions can increase screening uptake and through which mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Future research should focus on identifying effective intervention strategies within European settings and other countries worldwide to assess whether there are specific differences in screening barriers and uptake between countries, including a more diverse range of health inequity groups, for example, LGBTQ+ persons. A recent meta-analysis of digital interventions aiming to promote colorectal cancer screening uptake in people of average risk also noted that current evidence is based only on studies from Western settings and that more work was needed to verify if the same outcomes can be achieved in other populations, especially within Asia (Lau et al ., 2022). More research is needed to identify how such interventions can increase screening uptake and through which mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worth considering how digital interventions can be designed without reducing the need for shared decision-making between patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs), and whether such interventions can specifically include elements to increase patient-HCP communication to encourage shared decision-making. A meta-analysis of people with an average risk for colorectal cancer demonstrated that digital interventions were more likely to promote colorectal cancer screening uptake than usual care, with an odds ratio of 1.13 (95% confidence interval, 1.1–1.6), especially with interventions that included interactive web- or tablet-based decision-making aids (Lau et al ., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation