1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-76550-6_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Economics, Psychology, and Sociology Might Produce a Unified Theory of Fertility and Labour Force Participation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…childbearing) desires, preferences, intentions, and expectations (Hendershot & Placek, 1981). Related approaches include microeconomic models of fertility (Turchi, 1991) and the demand-for-children models (Lee & Bulatao, 1983;McClelland, 1983), which are generally based on the concept of desired or preferred family size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…childbearing) desires, preferences, intentions, and expectations (Hendershot & Placek, 1981). Related approaches include microeconomic models of fertility (Turchi, 1991) and the demand-for-children models (Lee & Bulatao, 1983;McClelland, 1983), which are generally based on the concept of desired or preferred family size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the social and behavioural sciences, many studies have explored such questions as what motivates people to bear children [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. From these studies, a number of explanatory frameworks have emerged, including psychological theories of reasoned action [37], the values and dis-values that children have for parents [38], microeconomic or demand-for-children models of fertility [39], the Traits-Desires-Intentions-Behaviour model of fertility [29], social norms and roles theories of fertility desire [10], the sexual drive and desire for physical intimacy framework [29], and the maternal drive framework (i.e. motherhood is often reflected as a typical part of every woman's female identity) [40].…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The youngest participant was aged 18 years and the oldest was 47 years. A little over half of the participants (39) resided in rural areas, and the rest came from urban or peri-urban areas. Most of the participants (58) had no formal education.…”
Section: Participants' Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%