How economics frames political debates: macroeconomic forecasting in the French planning commissions

Abstract

This article analyzes how economics can frame political debates using economic policy devices. It examines the FIFI macroeconomic model’s introduction into the French planning processes of the mid-1960s and argues that economists perform two operations, selection and qualification, which play a key role in structuring political debates on the French economy’s future. Building on archives and in-depth interviews, I show how the FIFI model was a central component of the Sixth Plan (1971–1975): it was designed to produce simulations of state intervention in the French economy and organize planning commissions debates. Studying the struggles and controversies surrounding this model and the economic policies promoted by it, the article ultimately shows how certain political options are made publicly available while others are discarded.

Risk Entanglement in the Finance-State Nexus: The Case of Systemic and Political Risk

“…Reflections of these transformations in economic sociology and political economy argue that financialization, understood as the expansion of market-based financial logics to other economic and societal areas (van der Zwan, 2014 ), is less contained through these interventions but is, in part, an essential component of them. Basically, scholars elaborate on the historical roots of financialization (Krippner, 2011 ; Davis and Walsh, 2016 ), on economists as a prestigious expert group (Hirschman and Berman, 2014 ), or on the implementation of economic models and metrics for financial and likewise non-financial policies (Heimberger et al, 2020 ; Angeletti, 2021 ).…”

Transcending History’s Heavy Hand: The Future in Economic Action

“…To give just three examples, Angeletti's (2019) research shows how the use of economic models by French government planners did not have straightforward performative effects. Economic models framed how political actors thought about political feasibility and economic possibility, but left considerable room for administrators to develop creative strategies for economic governance.…”

Economic Ideas, Policy and National Culture

“…Economics itself, in its significant part, moved towards becoming more 'technical', more standardized, and more closely resembling its American counterpart. In particular, INSEE economists played a significant role in setting the economic policy agenda, defining the policy options and forecasting their effects (see a fascinating case study by Angeletti [2021]).…”