2011
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0054-11.2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Does Your Cortex Grow?

Abstract: Understanding human cortical maturation is a central goal for developmental neuroscience. Significant advances towards this goal have come from two recent strands of in-vivo structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) research: (i) longitudinal study designs have revealed that factors such as sex, cognitive ability and disease are often better related to variations in the tempo of anatomical change than to variations in anatomy at any one time-point, and (ii) largely cross-sectional applications of new “surfa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

71
647
5
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 644 publications
(726 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
71
647
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As indicated by our analysis, CSA and CT can be partly conceived as being distinct traits, and thus their analysis provides more nuanced information than the sole computation of CV as implemented in VBM. Given this understanding, the present study concurs with a pool of recent reports which also demonstrated the genetically and phenotypically distinctiveness of CT and CSA [38,39,41,40,42,43,65,44,45,46]. It is important to mention that CV cannot be interpreted as a simple compilation of CT and CSA.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As indicated by our analysis, CSA and CT can be partly conceived as being distinct traits, and thus their analysis provides more nuanced information than the sole computation of CV as implemented in VBM. Given this understanding, the present study concurs with a pool of recent reports which also demonstrated the genetically and phenotypically distinctiveness of CT and CSA [38,39,41,40,42,43,65,44,45,46]. It is important to mention that CV cannot be interpreted as a simple compilation of CT and CSA.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, if these variables run in opposite directions, CV measurements could be confounded and tinnitus-related alter-80 ations might be obscured. Since that publication a number of investigations empirically disentangled CSA measurements from the quantification of thickness [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. as a function of the particular measurement methodology being used (VBM vs. measurement of CT by SBM) [47].…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All sMRI brain scans were T-1 weighted images with contiguous 1.5-mm axial slices, obtained on the same 1.5-T General Electric Signa scanner using a 3D spoiled gradient recalled echo sequence (see SI Methods for scan acquisition parameters). Native sMRI scans were submitted to the CIVET pipeline † for automated morphometric analysis, as described previously (31). This well-validated set of image-processing algorithms generates estimates total GMV, WMV, and CSF, as well as creating a 3D reconstruction of the convoluted cortical sheet for each scan, from which four metrics are derived: total CV and SA, mean CT, and estimates of both CT and SA at 800,000 points (vertices) across the cortical sheet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that gyrification measures the amount of surface enclosed in a restricted space, it is not surprising to find results in similar direction and location using either gyrification or measuring regional areas. In healthy adults, cortical thickness is determined by complex maturational changes that occur during adolescence (Shaw et al, 2008), whereas cortical surface area is less affected by maturational changes (Raznahan et al, 2011). This may explain the weak correlation between cortical thickness and gyrification or cortical area (Hogstrom et al, in press).…”
Section: Group Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%