2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does the inclination of the tibial component matter? A three-dimensional finite element analysis of medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rivière et al 35 conducted the computer simulation study and revealed that a varus aligned tibial tray in Oxford UKA showed better adaptation than mechanical aligned (perpendicular to the tibial axis) tray. Dai et al 36 reported that a slight varus implantation of the Oxford tibial tray reduced the peak stress on the medial cortex in a 3-D finite element analysis study. In addition, these experimental studies, the acceptable range of tibial component alignment has been considered within < 5° varus to < 5° valgus 37 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rivière et al 35 conducted the computer simulation study and revealed that a varus aligned tibial tray in Oxford UKA showed better adaptation than mechanical aligned (perpendicular to the tibial axis) tray. Dai et al 36 reported that a slight varus implantation of the Oxford tibial tray reduced the peak stress on the medial cortex in a 3-D finite element analysis study. In addition, these experimental studies, the acceptable range of tibial component alignment has been considered within < 5° varus to < 5° valgus 37 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They consistently demonstrated that neutral alignment in the coronal plane is most optimal in terms of strain on the native tibia. 101 - 103 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Dai et al concluded that a slight varus inclination of the mobile-bearing tibial component is acceptable as it lowers the peak stress on the medial cortex using a three-dimensional finite element analysis. 22 Zambianchi et al reported that revised UKAs had an average tibial component alignment of 0.2 AE 2.5 degree varus, while unrevised UKAs showed an average tibial component alignment of 3.8 AE 3.7 degree varus. They suggested that a slight varus alignment of the tibial component relative to the tibial longitudinal axis may be preferable over valgus deviations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%