2022
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2022.234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does the electric field make a droplet exhibit the ejection and rebound behaviour on a superhydrophobic surface?

Abstract: A droplet impinging on a superhydrophobic substrate in an electric field is an important process in droplet manipulation and electrostatic spraying. Here, the entire impinging dynamic of the droplet in a vertical electric field is studied by a visualization experiment and numerical simulation with OpenFOAM. We investigate the effect of an electrostatic force on droplet impact in depth, where four ejection modes and three rebound modes are found experimentally. In particular, the filamentous ejecting phenomenon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 In addition, the vulnerability of microstructures and nanostructures and the instability of separation air cushions in them on these surfaces can lead to an undesired conversion of droplets from the Cassie state to the Wenzel state, especially when exposed to liquid impact, abrasion, and moisture environments. 21,22 Unlike superhydrophobic surfaces, Nepenthes pitcher plantinspired slippery surfaces have a firmly attached insoluble lubricant between the droplet and the solid surface, offering a more adaptable platform for manipulating droplets. [23][24][25] The lubricant injection ensures excellent repellence to various liquids with low contact angle hysteresis, while the substantial interfacial tension between the droplet and the lubricant prevents droplets from hard-controlled detaching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 In addition, the vulnerability of microstructures and nanostructures and the instability of separation air cushions in them on these surfaces can lead to an undesired conversion of droplets from the Cassie state to the Wenzel state, especially when exposed to liquid impact, abrasion, and moisture environments. 21,22 Unlike superhydrophobic surfaces, Nepenthes pitcher plantinspired slippery surfaces have a firmly attached insoluble lubricant between the droplet and the solid surface, offering a more adaptable platform for manipulating droplets. [23][24][25] The lubricant injection ensures excellent repellence to various liquids with low contact angle hysteresis, while the substantial interfacial tension between the droplet and the lubricant prevents droplets from hard-controlled detaching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 In addition, the vulnerability of microstructures and nanostructures and the instability of separation air cushions in them on these surfaces can lead to an undesired conversion of droplets from the Cassie state to the Wenzel state, especially when exposed to liquid impact, abrasion, and moisture environments. 21,22…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Nowadays, inspired by the "dorsum of the Namib desert beetle," creating droplet arrays with a specific geometry and volume on heterogeneous patterned surfaces has been developed as an efficient method to facilitate high-throughput and programmable on-surface droplets processing. [13][14][15][16][17] The droplet repellency from the superhydrophobic (SHB) or superamphiphobic (SAB) backgrounds and the droplet anchoring property from the hydrophilic or amphiphilic regions can be integrated into a surface. The heterogeneous wettability surface-based method has remarkable extendibility, addressability, and accessibility, showing more controllable interactions with droplet arrays than homogeneous surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies usually converted the surface charge to the volume charge as a simplification (Das, Dalal & Tomar 2021; Tian et al. 2022), since it is too difficult to directly solve the jumps of stresses at the interface by the two methods. The electric volumetric forces are then included in the momentum conservation equation as a numerical treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a typical leaky-dielectric fluid (Saville 1997), the density of charge is zero in the bulk but both tangential and normal electric stresses appear at the two-phase interface to balance with the viscous stress. Previous studies usually converted the surface charge to the volume charge as a simplification (Das, Dalal & Tomar 2021;Tian et al 2022), since it is too difficult to directly solve the jumps of stresses at the interface by the two methods. The electric volumetric forces are then included in the momentum conservation equation as a numerical treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%