2014
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.201300339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does sonication affect the mineral and organic constituents of soil aggregates?—A review

Abstract: Application of ultrasound to disperse soil aggregates has been critical in enabling researchers to separate and analyze aggregate building blocks that include organic and mineral particles as well as mineral associated organic matter. But the forces generated in the process may also alter the dispersion products and, thus, potentially interfere with the interpretation of experimental results. This review summarizes present knowledge on experimental conditions that may lead to physical damage and chemical modif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Golchin et al, 1994;Cerli et al, 2012;Kaiser and Berhe, 2014). The fractionation scheme we and others have used for sediments is less energetic or disruptive (at least in the latter stages) than commonly used for soils and these methodological contrasts need to be considered when comparing results.…”
Section: Density Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Golchin et al, 1994;Cerli et al, 2012;Kaiser and Berhe, 2014). The fractionation scheme we and others have used for sediments is less energetic or disruptive (at least in the latter stages) than commonly used for soils and these methodological contrasts need to be considered when comparing results.…”
Section: Density Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mineral-rich/organicpoor soils and sediments typically have densities over the range of ∼ 2.4-2.9 g cm −3 ; mineral-poor/organic-rich soils and sediments have densities between ∼ 1.0 and 1.5 g cm −3 (Adams, 1973;Rühlmann et al, 2006). Density fractionation has been widely used on soils to elucidate mechanisms of how organic matter is physically and chemically associated with minerals and to estimate stability, residence and turnover times of organic matter (e.g., Golchin et al, 1994;Hedges and Oades, 1997;Baldock and Skjemstad, 2000;Baisden et al, 2002a;Sollins et al, 2006;Rühlmann et al, 2006;Crow et al, 2007;Castanha et al, 2008;Trumbore, 2009;Cerli et al, 2012;Kaiser and Berhe, 2014). The chemistry, stable and radiocarbon isotopic compositions, and turnover times for isolated fractions is particularly dependent on methodology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is used for studying reduction of aggregate size (Imeson and Vis, 1984) as well as detachment of occluded POC (Golchin et al, 1994). Kaiser and Berhe (2014) reviewed 15 studies using ultrasonication of soil aggregates in consideration of its destructiveness to the soil mineral matrix and occluded POM. They found destruction of POM at applied energy levels > 60 J mL −1 , destruction of sand-sized primary particles at > 710 J mL −1 and of smaller mineral particles at even higher energy levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method combines a modified enzymatic pretreatment (Böckelmann et al, 2003) with α-glucosidase, β-galactosidase, DNAse and lipase, a determination of the DNA ratio of sessile to suspended cells after enzymatic treatment and an ultrasonication of soil aggregates followed by density fractionation and soil organic carbon (SOC) measurement (Kaiser and Berhe, 2014). The ultrasonication/density fractionation separates SOC into three operational solid fractions: non-occluded free light fraction SOC (fLF-SOC), aggregate-embedded occluded light fraction SOC (oLF-SOC) and colloidal as well as (macro)molecular SOC, which is not detachable from mineral surfaces by the chosen fractionation method and subsumed under heavy fraction (HF-SOC) (Kaiser and Berhe, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation