2020
DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i5.818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does self-performance expectation foster breakthrough creativity in the employee's cognitive level? An application of self-fulfilling prophecy

Abstract: Drawing on self-fulfilling prophecy theory and status boundary conditions, the aim of this research is to test if promotion focus motivation mediates the employees' self-performance expectations towards breakthrough creativity. Besides, this paper also examines whether status stability significantly moderates the relationship between self-performance expectations and promotion focus motivation. The author conducted a longitudinal study and surveyed 380 staff in China with 102 immediate supervisors. In the firs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, managers may consider other sustainable HR practices ie training on self-actualization, 6 counselling on self-performance expectations, 62 investing in human capital, 63 and providing satisfactory psychological climate 64 to activate the employee empowerment that later can foster employees to engage in positive organizational behaviours. Pay is also termed as suitable HR practice that promotes taking charge behaviour.…”
Section: Results Discussion Implications and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, managers may consider other sustainable HR practices ie training on self-actualization, 6 counselling on self-performance expectations, 62 investing in human capital, 63 and providing satisfactory psychological climate 64 to activate the employee empowerment that later can foster employees to engage in positive organizational behaviours. Pay is also termed as suitable HR practice that promotes taking charge behaviour.…”
Section: Results Discussion Implications and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, this study expands relevant studies in the field of status research. At present, the research on status stability remains in the exploratory stage, and the relevant research has mainly focused on its moderating effect (Bettencourt et al, 2001;Saguy & Dovidio, 2013;Hossain et al, 2020); few studies have discussed its main effect. Accordingly, this research attempts to inaugurate a special study on the impact of status stability on team creativity.…”
Section: Theoretical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, this default hypothesis lacks ecological validity and cannot truly describe the social structures underlying the relationship among team members. Simultaneously, in studies of organizational hierarchy, such as those pertaining to power disparity, status stability has also received extensive attention; however, most such studies focus have focused only on its moderating effect, such as the relationship between group status and intergroup attributes (Bettencourt, Dorr, Charlton, & Hume, 2001), status configuration and group performance (van Dijk & van Engen, 2013), group-based shame and ingroup favoritism (Shepherd et al, 2013), status differences and intergroup relationship (Saguy & Dovidio, 2013), group status and knowledge sharing behavior (Hu & Xie, 2015), self-performance expectations and promotion focus motivation (Hossain et al, 2020) and have neglected its main effect. As one of the important team characteristics, status stability will inevitably have a direct effect on team results, and is called for more attention (Chang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%