2005
DOI: 10.1002/jcaf.20098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does Sarbanes‐Oxley affect outsourcing?

Abstract: Outsourcing has been a favorite way for many companies to cut costs. But the recently passed Sarbanes‐Oxley Act may mean problems. Management must maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting. And this responsibility cannot be transferred to external entities. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Cannon and Growe [5], Laurent [21], Ge and McVay [11], Doyle et al [8] and Ashbaugh-Skaife et al [1] finding, we expect a negative relation between the ITC quality and the complexity: industry more articulated (banks and insurances), the companies more diversified, internationalized and with the IT given in outsourcing because these characteristics show higher risk.…”
Section: Determinants Of Itc Qualitymentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following Cannon and Growe [5], Laurent [21], Ge and McVay [11], Doyle et al [8] and Ashbaugh-Skaife et al [1] finding, we expect a negative relation between the ITC quality and the complexity: industry more articulated (banks and insurances), the companies more diversified, internationalized and with the IT given in outsourcing because these characteristics show higher risk.…”
Section: Determinants Of Itc Qualitymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Therefore it is important that the companies assign the responsibility on compliance with SOX or Italian law 262/2005 to IT auditors together with the auditors on financial reporting. When the company chose the strategy of outsourcing, the ITC can be transferred to the Outsourcer or to a Service Auditor, but the responsibility on the reliability of ICFR is always to the CFO or CEO that should evaluate the ITC outsourced, involving more actors in the audit process [5]. Other researches investigate the IT expertise on audit [6,13,22].…”
Section: Determinants Of Itc Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesize that contracts, attestation reports from service auditors, direct evaluation of service provider by client and audit provision may be significant measures of AQ of outsourced ITC. The literature indicates that the least preferable situation is the absence of the AQ of outsourced ITC (Cannon and Growe, 2005); the exclusive use of contract is less preferable than the use of a service auditor's report (Denyer, 2006b;Germano and Baker, 2003;Stanton, 2004;Nickell and Denyer, 2007); Type 1 reports are less satisfactory evaluations than Type 2 reports; and direct evaluation is the most preferable type of evaluation (Laurent, 2006;Gazzaway, 2004;Denyer, 2006a), especially when supplemented with a Type 2 report. Among the several measurements of AQ of outsourced ITC, we expect that only the direct evaluation of service provider by client and the Type 2 report (assurance on design and operating effectiveness of ITC) can be considered useful measures.…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The service auditor is an independent auditor engaged by the service provider to guarantee design and operating effectiveness to clients (Figure 1). Cannon and Growe (2005) analyze the responsibility of the client established by SOX, which is retained even when IT is outsourced: the audit can be carried out by a service auditor, but responsibility cannot be transferred and remains with the CFO and chief executive officer of the client firm. The responsibility of the client is one of the main reasons for the relation between the AQ of outsourced ITC and ITAQ.…”
Section: Aq Of Outsourced Itcmentioning
confidence: 99%