2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does personal relative deprivation affect mental health among the older adults in China? Evidence from panel data analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study also provided evidence to support the RIH in rural and urban Chinese older populations. The result reported a negative association between relative deprivation and SRH was in line with previous studies in China among adults and older populations ( 52 , 53 ). An explanation of why relative deprivation in income may lead to poorer health status is the concept of allostatic load ( 54 , 55 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This study also provided evidence to support the RIH in rural and urban Chinese older populations. The result reported a negative association between relative deprivation and SRH was in line with previous studies in China among adults and older populations ( 52 , 53 ). An explanation of why relative deprivation in income may lead to poorer health status is the concept of allostatic load ( 54 , 55 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Third, higher income resident groups can better mitigate the reinforcing effects of relative income deprivation on psychological capital deprivation and health inequalities compared to lower income groups, where the moderating effect on physical health is more significant. The findings are consistent with those of Lyu and Sun (2020). Since the absolute income of rural residents has a significant contribution to health status, on the one hand, we can increase the added value of agricultural products by increasing the income sources of rural residents, providing advanced technical support and working conditions for agricultural production, gradually moving down labor-intensive industries to create more labor jobs, reducing the cost of increasing income for rural residents, broadening the marketing channels of agricultural products, and extending the industrial chain of agricultural products.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The absolute income hypothesis theory is an important perspective for understanding the psychological decision-making and behavior of relative income deprivation ( Mackenbach, 2019 ), focusing on the differences in decision-making and behavior of households in different bands of absolute income ( Li et al, 2022 ; Wang et al, 2022 ; Zhou et al, 2023 ). However, little attention has been paid to the moderating role of different bands of absolute per capita household income in the RD’s impact on health inequalities among rural residents ( Lyu and Sun, 2020 ). Overall, rural households in different ranges of household income differ in terms of demographics, employment preferences, and capital accumulation, and may show variability in health care investment when RD increases ( Hastings, 2019 ; Yang X. Y. et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personal relative deprivation refers to the judgment that one is worse off compared with some referent target and the accompanying perception that one’s relatively disadvantaged situation is undeserved (Smith & Huo, 2014; Smith, Pettigrew, Pippin & Bialosiewicz, 2012). Previous studies have demonstrated that personal relative deprivation has many unfavorable consequences, such as poorer mental health and cognitive function (Lyu & Sun, 2020; Smith, Ryan, Jaurique & Duffau, 2020; Zhou & Qin, 2018) and lower subjective well‐being (Jin, 2016). Due to the aversive state of personal relative deprivation, individuals are often motivated to allay it through a variety of behaviors, even deviating from their moral principles to achieve what they feel they deserve (Callan, Shead & Olson, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%