2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does network structure affect partnerships for promoting physical activity? Evidence from Brazil and Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some potential explanations for the lack of evaluation are the scarcity of human resources (program staff have not been trained on process and impact evaluation), and the low priority given to effectiveness and impact of programs when allocating of resources. Some strategies for overcoming this barrier include partnerships with academic and research sectors to support program evaluation, as demonstrated by the work of project GUIA during 8 years of partnership with recognized government and research institutions in the U.S. and Brazil [46,47]. Formal evaluations of these programs will require natural experiment designs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some potential explanations for the lack of evaluation are the scarcity of human resources (program staff have not been trained on process and impact evaluation), and the low priority given to effectiveness and impact of programs when allocating of resources. Some strategies for overcoming this barrier include partnerships with academic and research sectors to support program evaluation, as demonstrated by the work of project GUIA during 8 years of partnership with recognized government and research institutions in the U.S. and Brazil [46,47]. Formal evaluations of these programs will require natural experiment designs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, ERGMs have found wide application in empirical research in the field of health and medical care . Recent examples include the study of referral networks among cancer services organisations , genetic variation in human social networks , the effects of collaboration among institutions on the promotion of physical activity , the impact of physicians' collaboration networks on hospitalisation cost and hospital readmission rate and the relation between competition for patients and relational coordination among hospitals . While addressing very different empirical settings, and interested in very different problems, what these studies have in common is a clear methodological commitment to modelling network mechanisms directly , rather than just attempting to ‘control for’ unspecified dependence among the observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is also unique in that it uses whole networks as the unit of analysis and makes statistical comparisons of different kinds of networks on network characteristics. To our knowledge, few other investigators have performed similar analyses (Fujimoto et al, 2009;Gould, 1993;Parra et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this is a method commonly used in network delineation (Marsden, 1990), there may be partners that were forgotten or otherwise excluded that may have been collected if we had used a snowball sampling method or another method of partner collection. We also used previously published methods (Harris et al, 2008;Parra et al, 2011) to account for non-responders and symmetrized data to a highest level of contact and collaboration. This may have increased the number of network ties, but would do so for all networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%