2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does managerial opportunism affect the cost of debt financing?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…On one hand, the lack of monitoring for bondholders can encourage managers to reduce creditors' wealth, which leads to credit quality deterioration. Hence, bondholders may require a higher interest rate to offset these risks (Saito, Sheng, & Bandeira, 2007;Ghouma, 2017).…”
Section: Agency Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, the lack of monitoring for bondholders can encourage managers to reduce creditors' wealth, which leads to credit quality deterioration. Hence, bondholders may require a higher interest rate to offset these risks (Saito, Sheng, & Bandeira, 2007;Ghouma, 2017).…”
Section: Agency Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shleifer and Vishny (1989) find negative wealth effect of managerial entrenchment due to increase in the agency cost between the managers and the stockholders. Ghouma (2017) finds that lower level of managerial entrenchment is associated with lower corporate bond costs and higher bond credit ratings. Billet et al (2007) finds that the firms with risky debt outstanding are less likely to be a takeover target.…”
Section: Erc Agency Issues and Market Frictionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The decline in funding growth from Third Party Funds has declined from 19.08% in 2011 to reach 6.89% in 2018. Higher bond costs and lower credit ratings are generally associated with increased income (Ghouma, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%