2014
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2013.2275078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Does Juxtaluminal Calcium Affect Critical Mechanical Conditions in Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque? An Exploratory Study

Abstract: The impact of calcification on the carotid atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability remains controversial and unclear. This study assesses the critical mechanical conditions induced by the calcium at the lumen surface, i.e., juxtaluminal calcification (JLCa), within human carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Eleven patients with evidence of JLCa were included for the analysis. The plaque geometry was reconstructed based on computed tomography and magnetic resonance images and 3-D fluid-structure interaction simulation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stiff calcium causes adverse stress within the plaque. The thinner the plaque cap is, the higher the stress concentrations it produces (Zhongzhao et al, 2014). A previous ex vivo study on biomechanical stability came to a different conclusion, suggesting that calcification does not increase fibrous cap stress in typical ruptured or stable human coronary atherosclerotic plaques (Huang et al, 2001).…”
Section: Calcification Location and Plaque Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Stiff calcium causes adverse stress within the plaque. The thinner the plaque cap is, the higher the stress concentrations it produces (Zhongzhao et al, 2014). A previous ex vivo study on biomechanical stability came to a different conclusion, suggesting that calcification does not increase fibrous cap stress in typical ruptured or stable human coronary atherosclerotic plaques (Huang et al, 2001).…”
Section: Calcification Location and Plaque Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, spotty calcifications were more frequently found in ruptured plaques (Sakaguchi et al, 2016). Most spotty calcifications in ruptured plaques tended to be found in more shallow locations (Sakaguchi et al, 2016), which is more likely to contribute to rupture (Li et al, 2007;Zhongzhao et al, 2014).…”
Section: Spotty Calcificationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The behavior of material properties is determined from experimental measurements, but also influenced by constitutive laws. Several potential strain energy density functions (SEDFs) can be used to characterize the material, such as neo-Hookean ( Akyildiz et al, 2011 , Caille et al, 2002 , Lee et al, 1996 , Ohayon and Tracqui, 2005 ), one-term Ogden ( Barrett et al, 2009 ), two-term Ogden ( Li et al, 2006 , Li et al, 2007 , Tang et al, 2008 , Versluis et al, 2006 ), Yeoh ( Cunnane et al, 2015 , Lawlor et al, 2011 ), five-parameter Mooney–Rivlin ( Gao and Long, 2008 , Maher et al, 2009 ), Demiray ( Chau et al, 2004 , Delfino et al, 1997 , Kaazempur-Mofrad et al, 2003a ), and modified Mooney–Rivlin SEDF ( Tang et al, 2009a , Tang et al, 2013 , Teng et al, 2014b ). These seven SEDFs have been used in numerous studies to model the mechanical behavior of carotid atherosclerotic plaques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%