2015
DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Does Interactivity Persuade? An Experimental Test of Interactivity on Cognitive Absorption, Elaboration, and Attitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
96
2
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
7
96
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A second explanation for our finding could be that older adults perceived the mode-tailored website to be more interactive, which increased their attention to the website and consequently their recall of information. A recent study by Oh and Sundar (2015) showed that modality interactivity on a website led to more favorable evaluations and greater cognitive engagement with the website. In fact, in a similar study we found that a mode-tailored website was perceived to be more interactive, which led to greater satisfaction with the website, as compared to nontailored websites (Nguyen, Van Weert, Bol, Loos, & Smets, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A second explanation for our finding could be that older adults perceived the mode-tailored website to be more interactive, which increased their attention to the website and consequently their recall of information. A recent study by Oh and Sundar (2015) showed that modality interactivity on a website led to more favorable evaluations and greater cognitive engagement with the website. In fact, in a similar study we found that a mode-tailored website was perceived to be more interactive, which led to greater satisfaction with the website, as compared to nontailored websites (Nguyen, Van Weert, Bol, Loos, & Smets, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, cognitive attributes such as working memory capacity and speed of processing that might explain age differences (Salthouse, 2004), and consequently how individuals interact with and respond to mode-tailored information, should be considered in future research. In addition, underlying mechanisms that might explain the effect of mode tailoring such as perceived modality relevance (Jensen et al, 2012) and perceived modality interactivity (Oh & Sundar, 2015) should be explored further. Finally, future research could extend this study by investigating other methods of tailoring the mode of information presentation.…”
Section: Implications and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, Huertas, Rovira and Fernández-Cavia (2011) conclude that city websites have greater scope for success if they include interactive elements such as chats or virtual communities. And, more recently, Oh and Sundar (2015) have explored the mechanisms by which the interactivity of a website enhances the persuasive potential of messages.…”
Section: Interactivity On Websitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work points out that when a website is more interactive, it can also increase absorption into the reading (Oh & Sundar, 2015), which has positive effects on information processing, and may even lead to higher favorability toward the content (Sicilia, Ruiz, & Munuera, 2005), and to higher recall and recognition (Xu & Sundar, 2016). Thus, research has shown that if a website is more interactive (e.g., contains more hyperlinks and requires more interaction from its users), citizens engage in more cognitive elaboration (i.e., making connections between news information and previous knowledge), which leads to increased recall of content (Tremayne & Dunwoody, 2001).…”
Section: Linearity Of Usementioning
confidence: 99%