2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does hydrofluoric acid etching affect the cyclic load-to-failure of lithium disilicate restorations?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hydrofluoric acid etching lithium disilicate provides fine surface texture that allows close adaptation interpenetration of the resin cement (Fig ); therefore, it may also play a role in reinforcing the strength of lithium disilicate in crown fracture testing as forces can be easily transferred to the supporting die. A previous study showed that etching with 3% or 5% hydrofluoric acid improved the cyclic load‐to‐failure of lithium disilicate crowns; however, this result was not observed in the current study. Due to the advantages in bond strength observed with etching hydrofluoric acid, clinicians should continue to follow manufacturers’ recommendations for etching lithium disilicate restorations when adhesively bonding.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Hydrofluoric acid etching lithium disilicate provides fine surface texture that allows close adaptation interpenetration of the resin cement (Fig ); therefore, it may also play a role in reinforcing the strength of lithium disilicate in crown fracture testing as forces can be easily transferred to the supporting die. A previous study showed that etching with 3% or 5% hydrofluoric acid improved the cyclic load‐to‐failure of lithium disilicate crowns; however, this result was not observed in the current study. Due to the advantages in bond strength observed with etching hydrofluoric acid, clinicians should continue to follow manufacturers’ recommendations for etching lithium disilicate restorations when adhesively bonding.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…The composite resin of ceramic reinforcement in a polymer matrix is ideal for implant-supported fixed prosthesis cases because the polymer composition improves the biomechanical properties and reduces the transfer of stresses to peri-implant structures. 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 Since all PFM failures start from the inner surface of the ceramic, 14 to ensure long-term bonding of the composite resin used to the PFM repair structure, the ceramic bonding surface needs to be treated before the composite resin is applied. 14 , 15 To this end, when considering PFM repair, surface interactions are essential to achieve micro-retained surfaces with high surface energy and stable chemical bonds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 Since all PFM failures start from the inner surface of the ceramic, 14 to ensure long-term bonding of the composite resin used to the PFM repair structure, the ceramic bonding surface needs to be treated before the composite resin is applied. 14 , 15 To this end, when considering PFM repair, surface interactions are essential to achieve micro-retained surfaces with high surface energy and stable chemical bonds. 16 , 17 Etching the fracture surface of ceramic restorations with hydrofluoric (HF) acid is generally recommended to enhance adhesion by increasing roughness and wettability, allowing for mechanical interlocking and chemical reactivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study on bone tissue formation, it was observed that HA coatings on zircon block contributed to the formation of new bone tissue [11]. It has been stated by many researchers that there will be no problems with adhesion resistance at the abutmentcrown interface with the use of hydrofluoric acid [12,13]. However, different surfaces are being studied to investigate the living cell reaction at the interface [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%