2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3343-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Does External Rotation Bracing Influence Motion and Functional Scores After Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization?

Abstract: Background After arthroscopic shoulder stabilization, the loss of motion or delayed recovery of motion remains a clinical problem and may lead to poor patient satisfaction. There remains no consensus regarding the optimal position for postoperative immobilization and it is not known whether the position for shoulder immobilization has an effect on motion and functional recovery. Questions/purposes We asked: (1) Do patients treated with external rotation (ER) bracing after arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Study Characteristics: Of nine studies [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], two were randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing rehabilitation approaches [16,17] while the remaining studies were either cohort [20], or case series [14,15,18,19,21,22]. Data from a surgical RCT that compared arthroscopic and open surgical approaches, but detailed postoperative rehabilitation [18] was included as a case series using only the ABR group.…”
Section: Data Screening and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study Characteristics: Of nine studies [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], two were randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing rehabilitation approaches [16,17] while the remaining studies were either cohort [20], or case series [14,15,18,19,21,22]. Data from a surgical RCT that compared arthroscopic and open surgical approaches, but detailed postoperative rehabilitation [18] was included as a case series using only the ABR group.…”
Section: Data Screening and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A suspected advantage of better ER due to postoperative immobilization in ER, while reported restriction with immobilization in IR, could not be detected. 24 , 34 Although a significantly better ER in the group of immobilization in ER appeared in the early postoperative period (up to the sixth postoperative week), the results nullified over time, so that there was no significant difference in terms of ER at the time of long-term follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Yin et al first evaluated the influence of external immobilization on the postoperative range of motion and shoulder-specific function scores after arthroscopic stabilization surgery. 34 They studied 33 patients with a mean follow-up duration of 16 months and could show that the preoperative level of ER was achieved at 3 months postoperatively and showed an increase in the mean ER from 62° preoperatively to 72° postoperatively at the mean follow-up. The authors reported a recurrence rate of 3%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immobilization in a shoulder orthosis is advised for 3-6 weeks with strict instructions to avoid active ER for 4-6 weeks in those patients with an additional labral repair [62] . An immobilization position of 10-20 degrees of ER and 30 degrees of abduction has been associated with a better functional improvement [63] . The therapist may allow gentle passive and active ROM in 90 -100 degree of elevation in the first4-6 weeks.…”
Section: Post Surgery Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%