2018
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does exercise treatment compare with antihypertensive medications? A network meta-analysis of 391 randomised controlled trials assessing exercise and medication effects on systolic blood pressure

Abstract: ObjectiveTo compare the effect of exercise regimens and medications on systolic blood pressure (SBP).Data sourcesMedline (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library.Eligibility criteriaRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), angiotensin-2 receptor blockers (ARBs), β-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and diuretics were identified from existing Cochrane reviews. A previously published meta-analysis of exercise interventions was updated to identify recent RCTs th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

18
192
0
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
18
192
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings have been reported previously in an extended cohort of this study, including older runners and finding greater regional distenibility in the descending aorta after marathon running (Bhuva et al, 2020). Though a 4/2 mmHg BP reduction seems small, this is highly consistent with the effect of exercise on BP reported in large meta-analyses, which is comparable with the effect of antihypertensive medication (Cornelissen and Smart, 2013;Naci et al, 2018) and also on aortic pulse wave velocity (Ashor et al, 2014). In terms of clinical relevance, if sustained, a 2 mmHg systolic BP reduction would be expected to reduce mortality from stroke by 10% and from vascular and ischemic heart disease by 7%, even in a low-risk, normotensive population (Lewington et al, 2002), underscoring the important role of increased physical activity in public health policy.…”
Section: Blood Pressure and Renal Biochemistrysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These findings have been reported previously in an extended cohort of this study, including older runners and finding greater regional distenibility in the descending aorta after marathon running (Bhuva et al, 2020). Though a 4/2 mmHg BP reduction seems small, this is highly consistent with the effect of exercise on BP reported in large meta-analyses, which is comparable with the effect of antihypertensive medication (Cornelissen and Smart, 2013;Naci et al, 2018) and also on aortic pulse wave velocity (Ashor et al, 2014). In terms of clinical relevance, if sustained, a 2 mmHg systolic BP reduction would be expected to reduce mortality from stroke by 10% and from vascular and ischemic heart disease by 7%, even in a low-risk, normotensive population (Lewington et al, 2002), underscoring the important role of increased physical activity in public health policy.…”
Section: Blood Pressure and Renal Biochemistrysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Nonetheless, it is difficult to draw conclusions from these studies due to differences among intensities, type of exercise (resistance vs. endurance), and kind of medication [14][15][16][17][18]. While the scientific literature is currently inconclusive, hypertensive individuals receiving ARB engage in physical activity programs, and the effects of this association need to be evaluated [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies and meta-analyses have also evaluated the impact of ET on BP, [11][12][13] including one with water ET. In comparison to the prior meta-analysis by Naci et al, 11 the same issue plagues both reviews/analyses, specifically a dearth of RCTs of ET in the population with HTN (N ¼ 1057 exercise HTN patients in the current study and N ¼ 3508 in the study by Naci et al).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies and meta-analyses have also evaluated the impact of ET on BP, [11][12][13] including one with water ET. In comparison to the prior meta-analysis by Naci et al, 11 the same issue plagues both reviews/analyses, specifically a dearth of RCTs of ET in the population with HTN (N ¼ 1057 exercise HTN patients in the current study and N ¼ 3508 in the study by Naci et al). While ET is proven equal to medications, as suggested by Naci et al, or slightly inferior to medications as firstline therapy, as the current study suggests, this does not impact a recommendation for ET for all individuals as either first-line or as an adjunct to initial therapy in uncomplicated HTN.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%