How does ethical climate enhance work–family enrichment? Insights from psychological attachment, psychological capital and job autonomy in the restaurant industry

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to propose a conceptual model that examines the role of ethical climate on work–family enrichment in the restaurant industry, which is one of the most vulnerable sectors affected by global crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The mediating effects of psychological attachment and psychological capital and the moderating effects of job autonomy were also investigated to enrich understanding of ethical climate and work–family enrichment. Design/methodology/approach The conceptual model was evaluated by using a quantitative–qualitative mixed-methods approach. In Study 1, survey data was collected from a sample of 405 restaurant frontline employees and analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Study 2, interviews were conducted with eight restaurant frontline employees and analyzed thematically. The data for Study 1 and Study 2 was collected from Jharkhand, a state in eastern India. Findings The results of Study 1 show a direct relationship between ethical climate and work–family enrichment. The mediating effect of psychological attachment and psychological capital on that direct relationship was also established, whereas job autonomy was found to be a significant moderator that negatively affects psychological attachment and work–family enrichment. The qualitative insights in Study 2 shed additional light on the rationales of the effects observed in Study 1 through the voices of restaurant frontline employees whilst triangulating the quantitative findings in Study 1. Research limitations/implications This research contributes novel insights that explain how ethical climate positively shapes work–family enrichment through the lens of psychological attachment and psychological capital, albeit cautiously, given the negative effect of job autonomy. Nevertheless, this research remains limited to restaurant frontline employees, thereby necessitating future research in other service industries to improve the generalizability of its findings. Originality/value This research offers a seminal extension of the direct effect of ethical climate on work–family enrichment (i.e. the “what”) by theorizing and validating the mediating (i.e. the “why”) and moderating (i.e. the “how”) effects of psychological attachment, psychological capital and job autonomy.

Artificial intelligence adoption among human resource professionals: Does market turbulence play a role?

“…Upon obtaining consent from both the participants and their management, physical questionnaires were distributed. Five hundred thirty‐four survey questionnaires were collected, however only 389 were considered useful, with the remaining questionnaires being dropped due to problematic issues such as zig‐zag responses, straight lines, and incomplete answers (Lim et al., 2022). The demographic details of respondents are mentioned in Table 1 below:…”

Psychological ownership rather than material consumption: Can fashion firms' new subscription services become an environmentally sustainable business strategy?

“…The concept of psychological ownership originally gained attention in corporate settings to determine how to improve employee performance (Pickford et al, 2016; Pierce et al, 2001). Other related concepts, such as psychological attachment and psychological capital, are also often discussed within the organizational psychology field (Lim, Cabral, et al, 2022). Psychological attachment refers to the extent to which an individual adopts or internalizes the organization's characteristics or perspectives, while psychological capital refers to the positive psychological resources that individuals possess, such as self‐efficacy, optimism, hope, and resilience (Lim, Cabral, et al, 2022).…”

“…Other related concepts, such as psychological attachment and psychological capital, are also often discussed within the organizational psychology field (Lim, Cabral, et al, 2022). Psychological attachment refers to the extent to which an individual adopts or internalizes the organization's characteristics or perspectives, while psychological capital refers to the positive psychological resources that individuals possess, such as self‐efficacy, optimism, hope, and resilience (Lim, Cabral, et al, 2022). Despite the existence of these related concepts, this paper specifically focuses on psychological ownership in the context of FSSs, a newly emerged ABS model in the fashion industry, due to its relevance to consumers' sense of possession over fashion items.…”

A work-family enrichment model of perceived overqualification: the moderating role of flexibility human resource practices

“…WFBSE can make individuals experience more positive affect such as positive mood, psychological well-being (Casper et al, 2018) and satisfaction with family roles (Myers and Major, 2017). Individuals can use these positive psychological experiences as resources to stay highly engaged in their work (Lim et al, 2023), thereby enhancing their development of job and personal resources (Lu et al, 2011). Furthermore, overqualified employees with higher WFBSE are released from the worry and preoccupation related to work-family conflict, and thus are more likely to concentrate and happily engross in their work.…”