2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does environmental regulation affect haze pollution governance?—An empirical test based on Chinese provincial panel data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neves et al [16] studied the effects of market-based regulations and regulatory policies on carbon dioxide emissions, and they found that environmental regulation is effective in cutting CO2 emissions in the long-run. Zhang et al [17] showed that China's current environmental regulation had effectively inhibited the haze pollution and achieved the expected effects.…”
Section: Environmental Regulation and Environmental Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neves et al [16] studied the effects of market-based regulations and regulatory policies on carbon dioxide emissions, and they found that environmental regulation is effective in cutting CO2 emissions in the long-run. Zhang et al [17] showed that China's current environmental regulation had effectively inhibited the haze pollution and achieved the expected effects.…”
Section: Environmental Regulation and Environmental Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salman et al (2019) found that exports increase CO2 emissions. Other studies discussed the pollution halo effect Sarkodie and Strezov (2019) and Liu et al (2018) and the pollution haven hypothesis (Zhang et al, 2019). The effect of trade on CO2 has scale, composition, and regulation effect (Farhani et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, rational environmental regulations effectively suppress CO 2 emissions [57]. In addition, governance cost constrains free-riding behavior and can more directly transmit changes in government environmental regulation [58,59]. More importantly, the marginal cost benefits the measurement of the spillover effect from neighboring provincial regions [54].…”
Section: Explanatory Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%