2014
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0481-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does enactment affect the ability to follow instructions in working memory?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

27
91
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
27
91
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, while visual tracking and imagined enactment were the most frequently reported encoding-based strategies for both verbal and enactment recall types, the forms of representation emphasized by these strategies may be more suitable for enacted recall. However, a purely output-based enactment advantage is unlikely; this effect appears to be substantially reduced when participants physically enact during encoding (Allen & Waterman, 2015), and recall success has been found to depend heavily on expected rather than actual mode of report (Koriat et al, 1990). Nevertheless, exploring interactions between encoding and retrieval, and the forms of representation involved, would be a useful focus for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, while visual tracking and imagined enactment were the most frequently reported encoding-based strategies for both verbal and enactment recall types, the forms of representation emphasized by these strategies may be more suitable for enacted recall. However, a purely output-based enactment advantage is unlikely; this effect appears to be substantially reduced when participants physically enact during encoding (Allen & Waterman, 2015), and recall success has been found to depend heavily on expected rather than actual mode of report (Koriat et al, 1990). Nevertheless, exploring interactions between encoding and retrieval, and the forms of representation involved, would be a useful focus for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility is that anticipated enactment leads to the creation of a motoric-based representation during encoding that better supports later recall. Such an account has previously been proposed to capture encoding-based enactment (or Subject-Performed Task) effects in measures of long-term memory (e.g., Engelkamp & Zimmer, 1989;Freeman & Ellis, 2003;Nyberg et al, 2001;Saltz & Donnenwerth-Nolan, 1981), and may also apply to the recent observation that this manipulation boosts verbal more than enacted recall in a working memory context (Allen & Waterman, 2015). Thus, anticipation and mental simulation of intended physical enactment may have a motoric component equivalent to that produced by actual enactment, and with similar benefits to working memory performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final article, by Allen and Waterman (2015), also addresses serial order, but focuses on the relatively underresearched task of remembering instruction sequences, and how different aspects of working memory contribute to this important everyday task. Their results point to the role of a possible action-motoric component of working memory that supports memory for action sequences.…”
Section: Contributions To This Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies reviewed here predominantly focused on more automated behaviours at the neglect of controlled cognitive processes. We speculate that interventions relying on both are likely to produce greater benefit than focusing on a single process alone [43].…”
Section: The Warm-up Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%