2002
DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.120487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does early ultrasound scan estimation of gestational age lead to higher rates of preterm birth?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
79
1
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
79
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Gestational age determination by ultrasound before 20 weeks, although more accurate than the date of the last menstrual period, leads to an increase in preterm births. 20 In Brazil, where the number of elective cesarean sections is extremely high, there is a cultural bias toward making the cesarean section a woman's choice. Also, the 'convenience' of its performance for the physician leads to the socalled 'iatrogenic' cesarean section.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gestational age determination by ultrasound before 20 weeks, although more accurate than the date of the last menstrual period, leads to an increase in preterm births. 20 In Brazil, where the number of elective cesarean sections is extremely high, there is a cultural bias toward making the cesarean section a woman's choice. Also, the 'convenience' of its performance for the physician leads to the socalled 'iatrogenic' cesarean section.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,16 Early ultrasound, which is the best method to assess gestational age, was not available as it is routinely performed in developed countries. 20,21 This might have resulted in classification errors in gestational age misclassifying preterm births in term births. We found only 1% of preterm births, whereas this rate is usually higher in sub-Saharan Africa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 In particular, early ultrasound corrects last menstrual period-based estimates by a systematic shift to the left (ie, toward lower gestational ages) across the entire gestational age distribution, primarily because of the effect of delayed ovulation. 31 Our method, however, corrects only gross errors by excluding preterm (and some postterm) infants whose birth weights are more compatible with 40-week births. We have also experimented with more complex statistical corrections (eg, Ϯ1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks), but the more complex algorithms are far more computer-intensive, result in many more exclusions, and do not substantially alter the slopes or SGA or LGA cutoffs of the reference curves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%