How does DICOM support big data management? Investigating its use in medical imaging community

Abstract

The diagnostic imaging field is experiencing considerable growth, followed by increasing production of massive amounts of data. The lack of standardization and privacy concerns are considered the main barriers to big data capitalization. This work aims to verify whether the advanced features of the DICOM standard, beyond imaging data storage, are effectively used in research practice. This issue will be analyzed by investigating the publicly shared medical imaging databases and assessing how much the most common medical imaging software tools support DICOM in all its potential. Therefore, 100 public databases and ten medical imaging software tools were selected and examined using a systematic approach. In particular, the DICOM fields related to privacy, segmentation and reporting have been assessed in the selected database; software tools have been evaluated for reading and writing the same DICOM fields. From our analysis, less than a third of the databases examined use the DICOM format to record meaningful information to manage the images. Regarding software, the vast majority does not allow the management, reading and writing of some or all the DICOM fields. Surprisingly, if we observe chest computed tomography data sharing to address the COVID-19 emergency, there are only two datasets out of 12 released in DICOM format. Our work shows how the DICOM can potentially fully support big data management; however, further efforts are still needed from the scientific and technological community to promote the use of the existing standard, encouraging data sharing and interoperability for a concrete development of big data analytics.

Magnetic resonance imaging enhancement using prior knowledge and a denoising scheme that combines total variation and histogram matching techniques

“…We assume that the image to clean is rather noisy (9%) that the reference image is not perfectly clean (3% noise) and that we have a 5-mm tolerance on what the slice reference position should be, so that the two cases vary from the real location, either below (-5 mm, case 3) or above (+5 mm, case 4). Tables 3,4 show that the improvement provided by the FP exact and FP approx methods is consistent with the previous cases. The method's robustness is even more noticeable because the results are obtained from reference images with an SSIM index (compared to the clean image) lower than the SSIM index of the image with noise at 3%.…”

“…Moreover, digital platforms and applications like big data are needed to manage diagnostic images correctly [3]. Furthermore, there are many unexplored potentials of the Digital Imaging and COmmunications in Medicine (DICOM) standard for leveraging the radiological workflow from a big data perspective [4].…”

Sharing and Cooperation of Improved Cross-Entropy Optimization Algorithm in Telemedicine Multimedia Information Processing

“…The regional medical data sharing and exchange platform adopts the international common medical data exchange standard HL7 [18] to International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications realize the data representation of each heterogeneous medical information system. Meanwhile, the DICOM standard is used to standardize medical image files [19]. When the medical image files are called and the required services are extracted from them, the standardized medical image files are transferred as SOAP attachments in the form of SOAP messages.…”

Pre-deployment assessment of an AI model to assist radiologists in chest X-ray detection and identification of lead-less implanted electronic devices for pre-MRI safety screening: realized implementation needs and proposed operational solutions

“…40,41,44,45,67,68 To that end, DICOM-structured reports (DICOM-SR) were recruited in the ZF GUI/viewer primarily for assigning spatial coordinates and simple shapes linked to coded text labels, all highly applicable to this work (Table 3; Appendix C). 42,43,[69][70][71] In addition, based on the practical experience of the ground-truth expert with the operations of the ZF GUI/viewer to date, noncontributing inference-display redundancy and complexity due to multiple overlapping identically labeled GBBs were reduced (Appendix C).…”