2003
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0637029100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does cyanide inhibit superoxide reductase? Insight from synthetic Fe III N 4 S model complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SCE), respectively, whereas CNligated 8 is reduced at a much more anodic potential of -805 mV versus SCE. [76] If cyanide were to cause an anodic shift in the redox potential of SOR by approximately the same amount (|∆E| Ն 470 mV), then the reduction potential of the catalytic iron center would fall well-below those of its biological reductants (center I, -236 mV versus SCE; rubredoxin, reported range -191 to -291 versus SCE). Thus, cyanide by preventing the enzyme from turning over because it prevents the regeneration of the reduced, catalytically active Fe 2+ state of SOR.…”
Section: Biomimetic Models Of Sormentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SCE), respectively, whereas CNligated 8 is reduced at a much more anodic potential of -805 mV versus SCE. [76] If cyanide were to cause an anodic shift in the redox potential of SOR by approximately the same amount (|∆E| Ն 470 mV), then the reduction potential of the catalytic iron center would fall well-below those of its biological reductants (center I, -236 mV versus SCE; rubredoxin, reported range -191 to -291 versus SCE). Thus, cyanide by preventing the enzyme from turning over because it prevents the regeneration of the reduced, catalytically active Fe 2+ state of SOR.…”
Section: Biomimetic Models Of Sormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[76] Cyanide and azide do not bind to reduced 3, and do not prevent 3 from stoichiometrically reducing superoxide. (8), on the other hand, is S = 1/2 over a wide temperature range (2-300 K).…”
Section: Biomimetic Models Of Sormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary amine thiolate tren-ligand falls somewhere in between, favoring the +3 oxidation state more than the amine, but less than an alkoxide. 46 Since an open coordination site, and a moderately low redox-potential are both necessary for efficient, inner sphere, substrate (e.g superoxide) reduction to occur, the combination of a thiolate (as opposed to an alkoxide or amine) coordinated to iron (as opposed to cobalt), with primary (as opposed to secondary or tertiary) amines creates both of these optimum conditions needed for this chemistry to occur. This implies that the cysteinate ligand of the non-heme iron enzyme SOR plays an important role in promoting function.…”
Section: Comparison Of Redox Potentials-correlation With Apical Ligandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59, 60, 62, 63, 7274 Both ligands constrain the geometry so that added “substrates” are forced to bind cis to a thiolate (e.g., structures 3 and 4 , Scheme 4). 64, 65, 75, 76 For example, superoxide (O 2 − ) reacts with reduced [Fe II (N 4 S Me2 (tren))] + at low temperatures in the presence of a proton donor 59, 75, 77 to afford a metastable, low-spin ( S = 1/2; g ┴ = 2.14; g ║ = 1.97) hydroperoxo intermediate, [Fe III (N 4 S Me2 (tren))(OOH)] + ( 3 , Scheme 4; υ O-O = 784 cm −1 ). 54 Bis-thiolate ligated 2 (Scheme 3) was shown to bind L = N 3 − ( 4 ) and NO cis to one of the thiolates and trans to the other (Scheme 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%