2019
DOI: 10.22495/cbv15i2art2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does board structure impact on firm performance in the UK?

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to examine whether or not the structure of the board of directors and, in particular, board size, independence and remuneration have an impact on firm performance. The sample examined is UK FTSE 100 non-financial companies using data from the period 2012 to 2015. A regression analysis has been used concluding a significant positive correlation between board remuneration and firm performance, namely Return on Assets and Tobin’s Q. The study also concluded a positive correlation between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
33
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Boards with no more than seven or eight members are seen to be effective (Jensen, 1993). Similarly, for a board to be effective it must have a maximum of 10 members, but preferably between eight and nine members (Lorsch & Lipton, 1992;Alqatan et al, 2019). The argument is that a small board is more beneficial because: (1) decisions can be made at a faster pace (Lorsch & Lipton, 1992) (2) coordination becomes easier, which makes any management manipulation difficult (Haniffa & Hudaib, 2006); (3) there is better communication and interaction between members (Ozkan, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boards with no more than seven or eight members are seen to be effective (Jensen, 1993). Similarly, for a board to be effective it must have a maximum of 10 members, but preferably between eight and nine members (Lorsch & Lipton, 1992;Alqatan et al, 2019). The argument is that a small board is more beneficial because: (1) decisions can be made at a faster pace (Lorsch & Lipton, 1992) (2) coordination becomes easier, which makes any management manipulation difficult (Haniffa & Hudaib, 2006); (3) there is better communication and interaction between members (Ozkan, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, institutional factors exerted a positive moderating effect on the relationship. Alqatan, Chbib, & Hussainey (2019) also reported a significant positive relationship between board independence and Tobin's Q measure of performance using FTSE data of 100 nonfinancial firms from 2012 to 2015. Koji, Adhikary, & Tram (2020) traced a negative relationship between board independence and performance in their study of 861 non-family and 551 family firms in Japan using data from 2014 to 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…According to Alqatan, Chbib & Hussainey [5], stakeholder theory is used to create a scenario that measures the company's performance when a company's directors direct their energies at rewarding all stakeholders instead of directing their energies solely towards rewarding the shareholders. The stakeholder theory considers organizations a collection of groups whose objectives must be coordinated by managers [27].…”
Section: Stakeholder Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%