2009
DOI: 10.1134/s1054660x09040021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does a dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate collapse?

Abstract: We emphasize that the macroscopic collapse of a dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate in a pancake-shaped trap occurs through local density fluctuations, rather than through a global collapse to the trap center. This hypothesis is supported by a recent experiment in a chromium condensate.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that for the parameters used in the experiment, the critical scattering length for pure contact interaction, given by (5.3) would be −0.3a 0 for λ = 1, which clearly shows that the instability is driven here by the dipole-dipole interaction. To calculate the exact stability threshold, one needs to resort to a numerical solution of the GPE (4.3); the result of such a calculation [99] is displayed as a thin line on figure 13 and shows a very good agreement with the data. The numerical solution reveals, for some values of the parameters (λ, a) close to the instability region, the appearance of 'biconcave' condensates, where the density has a local minimum in the center of the trap [100].…”
Section: Trapped Gas Geometrical Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Note that for the parameters used in the experiment, the critical scattering length for pure contact interaction, given by (5.3) would be −0.3a 0 for λ = 1, which clearly shows that the instability is driven here by the dipole-dipole interaction. To calculate the exact stability threshold, one needs to resort to a numerical solution of the GPE (4.3); the result of such a calculation [99] is displayed as a thin line on figure 13 and shows a very good agreement with the data. The numerical solution reveals, for some values of the parameters (λ, a) close to the instability region, the appearance of 'biconcave' condensates, where the density has a local minimum in the center of the trap [100].…”
Section: Trapped Gas Geometrical Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The results are summarized in the right panel of Fig. 6 as a thin line, while the thick line represents more accurate results calculated from solving numerically the GrossPitaevskii equation [29]. The dots with error bars correspond to experimental data [31].…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where a 0 is the s-wave scattering length, while the thick line is the numerical solution of the GP equation [29]. The dots with error bars are experimental data [31].…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An intuitive interpretation of the roton in an oblate trap was put forward by Bohn et al [128]. As the dipole strength is increased, it is energetically favourable for the dipoles to locally move out of the plane and align head-to-tail perpendicular to the plane, thereby taking advantage of this attractive configuration.…”
Section: Trapped Dipolar Condensatesmentioning
confidence: 99%