How do worry and clinical status impact working memory performance? An experimental investigation

Abstract

Background Previous research has suggested that worry is negatively associated with working memory performance. However, it is unclear whether these findings would replicate across different worry levels and in individuals with anxiety and depressive disorders (i.e. clinical statuses). Method One-hundred-thirty-eight participants performed a two-block working memory task (150 trials per block). Based on participants` current clinical status, four groups were considered (generalised anxiety disorder group: n = 36; clinical group with another anxiety or mood disorders: n = 33; subclinical group: n = 27; control group: n = 42). Trait worry levels were collected from all of the participants. Working memory performance was measured as accuracy and reaction time. Results During the first block, higher worry scores were significantly associated with longer reaction times. Moreover, the generalised anxiety disorder group, clinical group, and subclinical groups demonstrated significantly longer reaction times compared to the control group in Block 1, when age was controlled for. From Block 1 to Block 2, all of the participants demonstrated a significant decrease in accuracy and reaction time, regardless of worry level or clinical status. Conclusion The results indicate that higher worry levels negatively impact WM processing efficiency. Moreover, when age was controlled for, we found participants` clinical status to be linked with WM impairments. The results highlight the relevance of investigating the impact of different worry levels on cognitive processes across clinical and non-clinical populations.

Exploring change in cognitive-behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder—A two-arms ABAB crossed-therapist randomized clinical implementation trial.

“…Uncontrollable worry as a primary symptom of GAD can be seen as a dysfunctional cognitive strategy to cope with anxiety (Borkovec et al, 2004; Newman, & Llera, 2011; Roemer et al, 2005) resulting in a positive feedback circuit between pathological worrying and mental health problems (e.g., Mennin et al, 2009). Moreover, the worrisome thoughts may drain an individual’s available cognitive resources (Held et al, 2020; Hirsch & Mathews, 2012). Individuals suffering from GAD may experience physiological arousal even in calm situations.…”

Examining Working Memory Performance in Adult Psychosomatic Inpatients

“…+ 2 ) and participants were asked to perform the arithmetic operation and type in the result ( 7 4 5 in the present example). After eight additional arithmetic operations participants were asked to type in the last number they recall (see Held et al, 2020 for a more precise description of the task).…”

EngAge – A metacognitive intervention to supplement working memory training: A feasibility study in older adults

“…Indeed, older adults are more likely to perceive their memory as functioning more poorly as compared to when they were younger, and they are also less likely to perceive that they have control over their cognitive functioning, in particular, memory and learning. Such negative views impact actual performance, which further leads to less confidence, self-efficacy, and motivation towards engaging in effortful cognitive tasks [27] , [29] .…”