How do traditional masculinity ideologies and emotional competence relate to aggression and physical domestic violence in cisgender men?

Abstract

BackgroundMen are disproportionately often perpetrators of physical domestic violence (DV). Gender role constructs, such as traditional masculinity ideologies (TMI), are broadly accepted as an explanation for this effect. Emotional competence further constitutes an important role in TMI and the prevention of DV. However, the interactions between these constructs remains unclear.ObjectiveThe present study aims to investigate associations of TMI with aggression, DV perpetration, and emotional competence, while also examining emotional competence as a potential moderator.MethodA sample of 428 cisgender men (Mage = 43.9 ± 15.3) from German-speaking countries in Europe completed an anonymous online survey that assessed TMI, aggression, and DV perpetration as well as alexithymia, emotion regulation, and self-compassion as indicators of emotional competence.ResultsStrong TMI were associated with high levels of aggression and overall reduced emotional competence, as reflected by high levels of alexithymia, frequent use of expressive suppression, and low levels of self-compassion. Strong conformity to TMI was associated with a higher likelihood for DV perpetration when considering relevant sociodemographic covariates. Moderation analyses revealed that expressive suppression buffered the association between TMI and DV perpetration.ConclusionMen with strong TMI report high levels of aggression and impaired emotional competence. While strong conformity to TMI was associated with more frequent perpetration of DV, higher expressive suppression seems to buffer the association between TMI and DV perpetration. The present study highlights the importance of addressing gender ideologies when working on aggression, DV perpetration and emotional competence in men.

Have a Woman’s Heart but a Man’s Face: Perceptions of Gay Relationships in Greek Gay Men

“…Men are expected to accept and internalize the male gender value system, which constitutes the essence of traditional masculinity (Pleck, 1995). David et al, (1976) proposed that masculinity ideology is primarily based on four patterns, confirmed by current research (Logoz et al, 2023): men should (a) command respect and admiration, (b) avoid being perceived as feminine, (c) refrain from expressing fear, and (d) exhibit adventurous and risky behaviors. These traditional ideals about masculinity continue to strongly influence contemporary society, giving rise to psychosocial phenomena such as gender role conflict (GRC) (O'Neil, 2015).…”

Fear, helplessness, pain, anger: The narrated emotions of intimate femicide perpetrators in Latin America

“…Ongoing discussions include the link between emotions and actions (Bericat, 2015), the nature of emotions and feelings (Turner and Stets, 2006), the connection between subconscious processes and collective phenomena (Habermas, 2018), and the relation between emotions and discursive scenarios (Kleres, 2011). The latter is particularly important for this article since it addresses how prevailing narratives enable or dissuade experiences and social practices, such as racism (Ahmed, 2017), social change and masculinity (Logoz et al, 2023), and attitudes towards women (Jewkes et al, 2015).…”

Men’s Psychotherapy Dropout is Associated with Conformity to Traditional Masculinity Ideologies

“…The present study used cross-sectional data from an anonymous online survey called the Andromind Self-Test (AST). As previously described (Logoz et al, 2023;, the overall goal of the AST was firstly to provide subjects with feedback on their self-assessment of their psychological well-being. Secondly, the study aimed to gain a comprehensive understanding of psychopathology patterns typically observed in men.…”

“…In Switzerland, Germany, or Austria it is estimated that about 10-15% of men identify as non-heterosexual (Barrense-Dias et al, 2018), which is substantially lower than the 25% found in the current sample. The high prevalence of non-heterosexual men in the sample could be attributed to the increased psychological burden that often accompanies the marginalization of minority groups and the resulting minority stress (Logoz et al, 2023;Timmins et al, 2020).…”