2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12103-017-9411-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying Victimization Affect Fear and Coping among Students? An Application of General Strain Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many scholars have identified bullying victimization as a potent source of strain among schoolaged youth that could lead to various forms of deviance (Baker and Pelfrey 2016;Cullen et al 2008;Hinduja and Patchin 2007;Keith 2018;Walters and Espelage 2017). For example, Brady, Baker, and Pelfrey (2019) found that victims of both traditional bullying and cyberbullying were more likely to use drugs and carry a weapon at school.…”
Section: The Relevance Of Agnew's General Strain Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars have identified bullying victimization as a potent source of strain among schoolaged youth that could lead to various forms of deviance (Baker and Pelfrey 2016;Cullen et al 2008;Hinduja and Patchin 2007;Keith 2018;Walters and Espelage 2017). For example, Brady, Baker, and Pelfrey (2019) found that victims of both traditional bullying and cyberbullying were more likely to use drugs and carry a weapon at school.…”
Section: The Relevance Of Agnew's General Strain Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fear is an inner-directed emotion because feeling afraid and worried is indicative of being anxious (Mirowsky & Ross, 2017), whereas anger is outer-directed because this study measures it in terms of losing one’s temper (see below), which typically refers to becoming very angry toward other people rather than the self. Fear has not been examined as often as anger in GST research (Agnew, 2006a) until recently (Archer, 2019; Keith, 2018; May et al., 2015; Steele, 2016) but is relevant to deviance, especially, inner-directed, such as self-injury and suicide attempt, which are often intended to temporarily alleviate intense negative emotions, like fear and depression (Klonsky & Muehlenkamp, 2007; Valois et al., 2015). While fear of victimization as well as anger is an anticipated emotional reaction to experienced victimization, it is also expected in response to signs and perceptions of low security in prison (i.e., overcrowding and a lack of trust of correctional officers in securing order in prison), which increases the risk of victimization.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second dimension of cyberbullying research explores the effect of cyberbullying victimization on subsequent acts of crime and deviance. This includes violent and aggressive behaviors toward others (Calvete et al, 2010), the tendency to cyberbully others (Chapin & Coleman, 2017), juvenile delinquency (Hay et al, 2010), and bringing a weapon to school (Keith, 2017). This study will add to this second dimension.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study explains the link between cyberbullying victimization and participation in deviant health risk behaviors by applying general strain theory (GST). GST has been applied frequently to explain the link between cyberbullying and deviant behavior (Agnew, 2001; Hay et al, 2010; Jang, Song, & Kim, 2014; Keith, 2017; Patchin & Hinduja, 2011). The foundational proposition underpinning GST is that the presence of unwanted or noxious stimuli, called strains, produces negative emotions that can lead to deviant behavior.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation