“…Thus, on the average, the anionic species, PO 4 H 2– , PO 4 H 2 – , and Cl – , in the medium basically bind to the positively charged interior, whereas the cationic species, [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ and Na + , interact with the end carboxylate groups. Hence, an electrostatic binding of [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ species with the electric field arising from a negatively charged surface of the G1.5 dendrimer could be operative. ,, Accordingly, it has been pointed out that E °′ values of the couples show a negative shift , when the concentrations of macromolecular receptor increase if the electrostatic interactions between the oxidized and reduced forms of the redox couple with the receptor are effective: italicE normalb ° ′ − italicE normalf ° ′ = 0.0592 nobreak0em0.25em log ( K 2 + K 3 + ) where the subscripts b and f refer to fully bound and free probes and K 2+ and K 3+ are the binding constants of the reduced and oxidized species of the couple, respectively. With the purpose of checking this question, the redox potentials of the [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 3+/2+ couple in several dendrimer solutions were determined.…”