How do Stock Market Participants Value ESG Performance? Evidence from Middle Eastern and North African Countries

Abstract

Empirical evidence indicates that Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices are associated with firm financial performance, but little is known about stock market participants’ behaviour towards ESG practices, especially in unfavourable settings, where the level of shareholders’ protection is relatively weak. In this article, we examine whether ESG performance provides shareholders with value-relevant information to help them in their equity pricing decisions. Using a cross-country sample of non-financial firms drawn from 10 Middle East and North African (MENA) countries between the period from 2013 to 2019, we find evidence, which is based on the price specification of Ohlson (1995) valuation model, that ESG performance practices are positively priced by market participants and add incremental information content to earnings and book value of equity (BVE). However, when we split the aggregate ESG performance into its components, governance practice is found to be more value relevant than social practice, while the environmental pillar is found to be value (ir)relevant to shareholders. Results using the return valuation model complement and validate the price model specification. Our results suggest that social capital and institutional structures prevail on firm environmental impact. These results are robust to a set of additional tests. Overall, our empirical results indicate that market participants incorporate ESG performance when assessing firm value for the MENA region. Our findings could have several implications for managers, stockholders and regulatory bodies.

Achieving Financial Sustainability in Ghana’s Banking Sector: Is Environmental, Social and Governance Reporting Contributive?

“…Studies such as Lee and Yeo (2016), Zhou et al (2017) and Carè and Forgione (2019) showed that ESG reporting had a positive impact on the financial performance of firms. Some streams of literature, such as those of Carnevale et al (2009), Sharma et al (2019) and Al-Hiyari and Kolsi (2021), also demonstrated that ESG reporting hurts the performance of firms. The argument advanced by these studies is that ESG reporting consumes resources that exceed the benefits obtained from such practices.…”

The Credit Risk of Sustainable Firms during the Pandemic

“…The first stream of literature our article contributes to is the previous studies on the relationship between sustainability and a broad spectrum of variables accounting for firm performance (Al-Hiyari & Kolsi, 2021). This set of studies covering ESG and financial performance strives to explain findings by relating them to several social science theories, like the stakeholder theory (Freeman, 1984) and the signalling theory (Healy & Palepu, 2001; Spence, 1973).…”

Do Equity Investors Care about Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure Performance? Evidence from India

“…Fatemi et al (2018) demonstrate that ESG performance affects the firm’s value; ESG strength positively impacts firm’s value whereas ESG weaknesses negatively impacts the firm’s value. Al-Hiyari and Kolsi (2021) states that investors and participants in the market consider the ESG performance when determining the firm’s value. A similar study conducted by Wong et al (2021) on Malaysian firms confirms that ESG certification lowers the firms’ cost of capital.…”

“…Prior studies show that stakeholders are increasingly interested in non-financial disclosures on environment, social and governance (ESG) (Al-Hiyari & Kolsi, 2021; Khan et al, 2016). Many opportunities and challenges have emerged for firms with their shareholders regarding risk-return relationships.…”