How Do Residents Spend Their Shift Time? A Time and Motion Study With a Particular Focus on the Use of Computers

Abstract

Purpose To understand how much time residents spend using computers as compared with other activities, and what residents use computers for. Method This time and motion study was conducted in June and July 2010 at NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center with seven residents (first-, second-, and third-year) on the general medicine service. An experienced observer shadowed residents during a single day shift, captured all their activities using an iPad application, and took field notes. The activities were captured using a validated taxonomy of clinical activities, expanded to describe computer-based activities with a greater level of detail. Results Residents spent 364.5 minutes (50.6%) of their shift time using computers, compared with 67.8 minutes (9.4%) interacting with patients. In addition, they spent 292.3 minutes (40.6%) talking with others in person, 186.0 minutes (25.8%) handling paper notes, 79.7 minutes (11.1%) in rounds, 80.0 minutes (11.1%) walking or waiting, and 54.0 minutes (7.5%) talking on the phone. Residents spent 685 minutes (59.6%) multitasking. Computer-based documentation activities amounted to 189.9 minutes (52.1%) of all computer-based activities time, with 128.7 minutes (35.3%) spent writing notes and 27.3 minutes (7.5%) reading notes composed by others. Conclusions The study showed residents spent considerably more time interacting with computers (over 50% of their shift time), than in direct contact with patients (less than 10% of their shift time). Some of this may be due to an increasing reliance on computing systems for access to patient data, further exacerbated by inefficiencies in the design of the electronic health record.

Less direct patient care delivered by medical trainees by the end of a hematology‐oncology ward rotation: Association with empathy and related factors

“…Other studies have shown that a less complex case mix, increased patient volume, and nursing magnet designation were independently associated with increased direct patient care time . Studies of resident physicians have shown a decrease in DPCT and an increase in indirect patient care as a result of work hour restrictions . However, those studies did not evaluate DPCT longitudinally or in association with very specific environments such as training on a hematology‐oncology ward or in association with empathy, death salience, or empathy decline factors.…”

“Back to Bedside”: Residents' and Fellows' Perspectives on Finding Meaning in Work

“…Time-motion studies have shown current requirements result in a 2:1 ratio of time spent on documentation compared to direct patient care, with only approximately 10% of physician time spent actually providing care to patients. 24 A more recent study showed that the ratio of documentation to direct patient care may be as high as 5:1. 25 The ideal environment for finding meaning in work appears to conflict directly with the existing environment.…”

Explaining an increase in predicted risk for clinical alerts

“…Given an alert, a clinician has to decide quickly what to do about it in the presence of many competing inputs and responsibilities [14,15]. A concise explanation of an alert is helpful for triaging of alerts and clinical decision making.…”