2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2015.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do regulatory networks evolve and expand throughout evolution?

Abstract: Throughout evolution, regulatory networks need to expand and adapt to accommodate novel genes and gene functions. However, the molecular details explaining how gene networks evolve remain largely unknown. Recent studies demonstrate that changes in transcription factors contribute to the evolution of regulatory networks. In particular, duplication of transcription factors followed by specific mutations in their DNA-binding or interaction domains propels the divergence and emergence of new networks. The innate p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
89
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(87 reference statements)
5
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This functional diversification was not driven by divergent gene expression (Hughes and Friedman, 2005), nor different cellular localization (Marques et al, 2008) or biochemical mode of action. Rather, it is likely the consequence of altered substrate recognition through mutations in the recognition domains, reminiscent of alterations recently described in transcription factors (Singh and Hannenhalli, 2008; Voordeckers et al, 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This functional diversification was not driven by divergent gene expression (Hughes and Friedman, 2005), nor different cellular localization (Marques et al, 2008) or biochemical mode of action. Rather, it is likely the consequence of altered substrate recognition through mutations in the recognition domains, reminiscent of alterations recently described in transcription factors (Singh and Hannenhalli, 2008; Voordeckers et al, 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Here, the promiscuous form is the duplicated phr and not a single Phr peptide, which interacts with both Rap variants. Second, duplications are typically only considered important if both diverged duplicates survive over evolutionary timescales [3]. In contrast, Phr duplication and divergence are evolutionarily crucial for a specificity shift, but to complete the shift it has to be transient—with either divergence or duplication itself being lost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duplicate gene differentiation has heavily impacted the evolution of regulatory and metabolic networks (Reece-Hoyes et al, 2013; Voordeckers et al, 2015). Paralogs have contributed to the expansion of regulatory networks (Teichmann and Babu, 2004), the derivation of novel networks (Conant and Wolfe, 2006; Wapinski et al, 2010; Pérez et al, 2014; Pougach et al, 2014), the specialization of network regulation (Lin and Li, 2011), and the robustness of networks to perturbation (Papp et al, 2004; Deutscher et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%