2008
DOI: 10.3758/mc.36.3.688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do readers handle incorrect information during reading?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
77
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
10
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…False sentences elicited larger N400s than true sentences, reflecting the early semantic processing costs associated with false sentences, even when no explicit verification is required (Nieuwland, 2013, in press;Nieuwland & Martin, 2012;Nieuwland & Kuperberg, 2008; for behavioral findings, see Isberner & Richter, 2014;Singer, 2013;Rapp, 2008). Crucially, "before" was associated with a reduced N400 truth value effect compared to "after," which resulted from false-before-sentences eliciting smaller N400s than false-after-sentences, whereas true-beforeand true-after-sentences elicited similarly reduced N400s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…False sentences elicited larger N400s than true sentences, reflecting the early semantic processing costs associated with false sentences, even when no explicit verification is required (Nieuwland, 2013, in press;Nieuwland & Martin, 2012;Nieuwland & Kuperberg, 2008; for behavioral findings, see Isberner & Richter, 2014;Singer, 2013;Rapp, 2008). Crucially, "before" was associated with a reduced N400 truth value effect compared to "after," which resulted from false-before-sentences eliciting smaller N400s than false-after-sentences, whereas true-beforeand true-after-sentences elicited similarly reduced N400s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this protection seems to be limited in several ways. Failures of validation are numerous, for example, when readers apparently ignore inconsistencies in a text (e.g., Otero & Kintsch, 1992) or incorporate false information (Rapp, 2008;. One limitation is that only knowledge that is available and activated during comprehension by memory-based or strategic processes can be used for validation.…”
Section: Functions and Failures Of Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies demonstrate that when people are exposed to information known to be factually incorrect, the fiction nevertheless interferes with their abilities to answer related knowledge questions (Gerrig & Prentice, 1991;Rapp, 2008). Similarly, a series of laboratory experiments have shown that viewers, after they were exposed to fictional narratives, confused fact with fiction (Levine, Serota, Shulman, 2010) and drew from fictional information when answering knowledge questions about the actual world (Marsh, Meade, & Roediger, 2003;A.…”
Section: Fictional Media and Real World Beliefsmentioning
confidence: 99%