How do public services supply, livelihood capital, and livelihood strategies affect subjective poverty?

Abstract

Poverty is not only an economic problem but also a social problem, and there are certain limitations of objective poverty based on the population’s income. It does not reflect the residents’ true feelings regarding education opportunities, pension and medical security, and participation in decision-making. Researchers have studied it intensively in different objective dimensions of Chinese poverty, and little attention has been paid to subjective poverty. This study analyzes how public services supply, livelihood capital, and livelihood strategies affect subjective perceptions of poverty. The results show that public services supply, livelihood capital, and livelihood strategies significantly correlate with subjective poverty. Physical capital and social capital have the greatest effects on the occurrence of subjective poverty. The probability of subjective poverty decreases by 0.149 and 0.107 for each unit change in physical and social capital, respectively. What’s more, public services supply, physical capital, financial capital, and human capital affect the subjective poverty of urban and rural residents at different significance levels. It means that the formation of subjective poverty results from the superposition of multiple factors.

A study on the factors influencing the vulnerability of women of childbearing age to health poverty in rural western China

“…This accomplishment has not only had a profound domestic impact but also made a significant global contribution to the battle against poverty. Recent data from China revealed that by the conclusion of 2020, an impressive 98.99 million individuals residing in rural regions were successfully lifted out of poverty 6 – 9 . This milestone signifies the fulfillment of the objective of eliminating poverty and establishing a comprehensive and prosperous society for the new era.…”