2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
414
2
13

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 550 publications
(480 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
34
414
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, these findings may suggest that perceived similarity (such as shared interests or traits) between those who are higher in social media self-efficacy could increase trust in the information shared by other social media users. This is consistent with prior research findings that similarity with an information source predicts positive evaluations of information from that source (e.g., Flanagin, Hocevar, & Samahito, 2014;Metzger et al, 2010;Sillence, Briggs, Harris, & Fishwick, 2007). However, additional research is required to test this possibility, as this study did not directly measure perceived similarity between self-efficacious social media users.…”
Section: Trustworthiness Of Online Social Informationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Further, these findings may suggest that perceived similarity (such as shared interests or traits) between those who are higher in social media self-efficacy could increase trust in the information shared by other social media users. This is consistent with prior research findings that similarity with an information source predicts positive evaluations of information from that source (e.g., Flanagin, Hocevar, & Samahito, 2014;Metzger et al, 2010;Sillence, Briggs, Harris, & Fishwick, 2007). However, additional research is required to test this possibility, as this study did not directly measure perceived similarity between self-efficacious social media users.…”
Section: Trustworthiness Of Online Social Informationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Website design has improved over recent years and many people now take for granted good design. Poor design however still has the potential to lead to mistrust amongst users causing them to disengage with or exit the site early (Sillence, Briggs, Harris, & Fishwick, 2007;Sillence, Hardy, Harris, Briggs, 2014) potentially missing out on high quality information. Conversely, sites that are well designed and accessible may confer a degree of unwarranted credibility on their information content (halo effect).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The older workers argued that users should be made aware of the virtual coach's expertise and eligibility as it enhanced their confidence and trust to follow any advice given. Research by Sillence et al (2007) on the evaluation of online health information supported their concerns as the study discovered that after the initial evaluation of the readily accessible properties of the site, the user subsequently tended to evaluate the content by making judgments concerning the expertise of the authors and the credibility of the material. Ritterband et al (2009) also claimed that expertise and trustworthiness are imperative in establishing credibility, adding that providing important information about who gives the content (in this case the virtual coach) is necessary as it dictates its "believability" and ability to induce behaviour change.…”
Section: Credibility Of Behaviour Change Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%