2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“How do online and offline sampling compare in a multinational study of drug use and nightlife behaviour?”

Abstract: BACKGROUNDOnline sampling is widely used to recruit hard to reach samples such as drug users at nightlife events. We conducted the first study comparing differences in demographics, drug use and nightlife behaviour between an online sample of young adults engaging with the European nightlife scene, and an offline sample recruited at nightclubs and festivals in Europe. METHODSOnline participants who attended at least six nightlife events in the past 12 months were recruited using social media advertising (May-N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A limitation of the study is the substantial internal drop-out regarding questions of main setting of use and consequences of drug use. Moreover, 72% of the respondents were male, which might reflect a selection bias, as indicated by the following studies: (1) offline studies at one large festival and a large EDM event in Sweden consisted of 64 percent males in each study [ 18 , 81 ]; (2) a comparison of online and offline recruitment in the remaining European countries of the ALAMA study indicates that the online and offline sample consisted of 69% and 58% males, respectively [ 82 ]. Furthermore, the online participants were on average one year younger compared with offline participants, and drug use was slightly less prevalent in the online sample [ 82 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of the study is the substantial internal drop-out regarding questions of main setting of use and consequences of drug use. Moreover, 72% of the respondents were male, which might reflect a selection bias, as indicated by the following studies: (1) offline studies at one large festival and a large EDM event in Sweden consisted of 64 percent males in each study [ 18 , 81 ]; (2) a comparison of online and offline recruitment in the remaining European countries of the ALAMA study indicates that the online and offline sample consisted of 69% and 58% males, respectively [ 82 ]. Furthermore, the online participants were on average one year younger compared with offline participants, and drug use was slightly less prevalent in the online sample [ 82 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are particularly commonly used to recruit populations such as PWUD as these are often considered hard to reach through traditional sampling methods without affecting the study results. A recently conducted research in the European nightlife scene concluded that online sampling shows a good overall representativeness of the results compared to offline sampling ( Waldron et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers asked survey questions to respondents and recorded answers (on paper in 2016 and on electronic tablets in 2019), facilitating opportunities to answer queries and clarifications from respondents as they arose, as well as direct assurances of confidentiality. A sister study conducted in some of the same UK festivals at overlapping times and with overlapping researchers compared face-to-face convenience sample surveys with online surveys regarding prevalence of drug use and found overall reassuringly similar levels of self-reported drug use (Waldron et al, 2020). Slightly lower self-reported prevalence of drug use in the online surveys by comparison with the onsite surveys may relate to concerns about digital privacy, security and hacking, mentioned by some festival respondents.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%