2006
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do oncologists deal with incidental abnormalities on whole‐body fluorine‐18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT?

Abstract: Although methane sulfonate compounds are widely used for the protein modification for their selectivity of thiol groups in proteins, their intracellular signaling events have not yet been clearly documented. This study demonstrated the methane sulfonate chemical 1,4‐butanediyl‐bismethanethiosulfonate (BMTS)‐induced cascades of signals that ultimately led to apoptosis of Jurkat cells. BMTS induced apoptosis through fragmentation of DNA, activation of caspase‐9 and caspase‐3, and downregulation of Bcl‐2 protein … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
47
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
8
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Table 1 summarizes the findings of these reports. The rate of detected incidental foci ranges from 3.0% to 12.3%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Table 1 summarizes the findings of these reports. The rate of detected incidental foci ranges from 3.0% to 12.3%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been some reports of second primary malignancies detected on the F-18 FDG PET/CT scans. However, those were limited to solid tumors [16][17][18][19]. Hematologic malignancy is difficult to detect with conventional CT images because it is a systemic disease that can present without definite anatomical change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron (F-18 FDG) emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has expanded extensively in oncology because of excellent sensitivity and specificity [1][2][3]. As a result, incidental detection of unexpected second primary malignancies not found by conventional imaging modalities has also increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And, in the situation where most PET studies are now performed on PET/CT, does the anatomic correlation indicate a possible causality? When experienced PET readers apply such filters to their interpretation of PET, there is evidence that nonmalignant focal 18 F-FDG accumulations can generally be recognized as such (19). In cases where the answers to the above questions still leave the reporting physician in doubt, delayed imaging encompassing both the primary and the remote sites and calculation of their relative RIs may provide a further clue to the likelihood of malignancy.…”
Section: F-fdg From a Remotementioning
confidence: 99%