How do national cultures impact the operations strategy process?

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the extent to which different patterns of cross-functional integration and the operations strategy (OS) process may be explained by national cultures differences. Design/methodology/approach Perceptual survey data from 105 manufacturing plants in four countries were used to validate the constructs and to test the hypotheses. The plants are located in two Western and two Eastern countries with different industrialization and development backgrounds (Brazil, China, Germany and South Korea). CFA validated the constructs, and ANOVA and t-tests evaluated the differences between levels of four Hofstede’s elements (i.e. power distance, individualism vs collectivism, uncertainty avoidance and long-term vs short-term orientation) on the OS process enablers (i.e. leadership for cross-functional integration and functional integration) and elements (i.e. manufacturing strategy linkage to corporate strategy and formulation of manufacturing strategy). Findings Results suggest that different OS and OM processes are present in different national cultures. Leadership for cross-functional integration and manufacturing strategy linkage to corporate strategy differ between levels of power distance, individualism vs collectivism and uncertainty avoidance. Functional integration and formulation of manufacturing strategy also present differences according to the degree of individualism vs collectivism and long-term orientation. Originality/value Results indicate that national culture is a key aspect for the OS process. Prior studies usually do not consider cultural aspects. Therefore, the OS process varies in different countries and contexts. Managers need to adjust their OS process when they are developing a global OS.

Cross-Cultural Issues and Human Resources Management in BRIC Countries

“…According to (Minkov et al, 2017), on the scores of the collectivism/individualism dimension, it is found that Brazil, Russia, China, and India are collectivist societies. While a study done by (Beugelsdijk & Welzel, 2018;Lee Park & Paiva, 2018) indicate that Brazil has shifted toward individualism, while there is a consistent result for Russia, China and India for collectivism. Further analysis has been adopted from Hofstede Insight (https://www.hofstede-insights.com) to analyze the cultural dimension among BRIC members.…”

The Impact of Social Media Technologies on Supplier and Customer Relationship Management: An Empirical Analysis in the U.S.

“…The alpha coefficients for all variables were between .710 and .901, which met the suggested threshold of .70 or higher [79], [80]. Next, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted to test the construct validity [81]. The CFA results (Chi-square = 381.183; d.f.…”

Individual and cultural differences in newsvendor decision making

“…Scholars argue that OM problems due to cultural issues can seldom be generalised. They offer evidence that culture matters for a wide range of operational decisions, and conclude that OM decisions must therefore account for cultural effects (Pagell et al, 2005;Metters et al, 2010;Lee Park and Paiva, 2018). Researchers have identified dimensions…”