2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11426-021-1083-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do molecular interactions affect fluorescence behavior of AIEgens in solution and aggregate states?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemie actions within the crystals than that in films. [23] The TPA moieties in the crystal structures showed a twisted structure, which matched well with the calculation results. The twisted structures of these AIEgens avoided long-range π-π stacking and emission quenching resulted by π-π stacking.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Chemie actions within the crystals than that in films. [23] The TPA moieties in the crystal structures showed a twisted structure, which matched well with the calculation results. The twisted structures of these AIEgens avoided long-range π-π stacking and emission quenching resulted by π-π stacking.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Overall, the crystal structures exhibited redder emissions compared with the amorphous film states (Figure S44), suggesting the stronger intermolecular inter- actions within the crystals than that in films. [23] The TPA moieties in the crystal structures showed a twisted structure, which matched well with the calculation results. The twisted structures of these AIEgens avoided long-range π-π stacking and emission quenching resulted by π-π stacking.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The strong emission in the crystalline phase might be expected since these interactions are beneficial in restricting intramolecular motions and turning on the AEE activity. 39 Scheme 1 Synthetic route to compounds 3.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the ground structure exhibits obvious discrepancies with the RMSD value of 0.202 Å, displaying much greater molecular motions from the S 0 to S 1 state. The molecular motion freedom favors non-radiative decay 39 and results in weaker luminescence. The grinding-induced red-shifted emission is the synergistic effect of unrestricted geometric relaxation 51 and the more planar configuration (Table S2, ESI †).…”
Section: Theoretical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%